+- The Breast Enhancement Archive (https://forum.bearchive.co)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.bearchive.co/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://forum.bearchive.co/forum-8.html)
+--- Thread: Zoo Magazine (/thread-377.html)
Zoo Magazine - Bonecracker - 02-09-2014
Dear Zoo Magazine;
We have vastly different ideas about what constitutes a DD cup and what also constitutes "bra busting big tits".
Numbers 33 and 36 are the only qualifiers.
41 Mega-boobed babes, me arse.
http://www.zootoday.com/girls/cover-girls/38-mega-boobs-in-one-big-breasted--bra-busting--dd-beating-gallery
RE: Zoo Magazine - addy2000 - 02-09-2014
To be fair, Zoo isn't the only offender in that regard, even porn does that quite often
RE: Zoo Magazine - Djoser - 02-10-2014
ah some are quite pretty, albeit not busty enough.
RE: Zoo Magazine - Archaon - 02-11-2014
Disclaimer - in my mind Nuts and Zoo are one and the same and effectively interchangeable. When I talk about one I may well mean the other, and vice versa.
I've not bothered to run through the gallery, but they have had some good models over the years between them.
Maria Swan/Jana Defi, Jordan Carver (one of the shots of her actually included a nipple and for that I forever bow to them), Rachel Aldana, Hannah Elizabeth, Sophie Reade etc.
I've also seen them feature models like September Carrino, Leanne Crow and Sarah Nicola Randall in features like '100 Mega Boobs', though not as full sets (that doesn't mean it's not happened, just that I've not seen them).
10-15 years ago magazines like this were featuring B and C cups on the cover whereas now you almost always see a girl in the DD-G range. Granted we're not talking truly huge boobs but nevertheless it's movement, albeit slow, in the right direction.