Well, sorry your work got attributed to anyone but you! And thnk you for identifying yourself. You do good work!!
We can work on setting up your own specie gallery here, if you would like.
I think he's trying to say Tina Small isn't fake...Or not. Not sure what he's trying to say.
Tina Small isn't fake? You mean she's real? LOL
Double negations make an affirmation
But ultimately Tina Small is the greatest case of "Shroedinger's Sandbags" out there.
I might be late to the party here… But I thought Tina Small was fake, strap on boobs, or something like that?
If you look at models who definitely wore rubber prosthesis, some of their photos show rough edges where the tops of the fake breasts ended and their skin began, and it's sometimes the blending is so bad it can be seen even in the soft focus photos, although you have to look at the original magazine prints from the 1980s and early 1990s, not the computer retouched pictures featured on the web. Another artifact of strap-on breasts is wrinkling that resembles that of a soft foam life vest when it's bent inward; it's very different from stretch marks in breasts. And while you could reasonably argue that Tina Small had better strap-ons than the models who came after her, I don't believe that to be so because shouldn't later versions of rubber breasts be better that the first, especially because John Xavier photographed both Tina Small and some of the strap-on models? Furthermore the book Big Girls Don't Cry has a childhood photo of her suffering from gigantomastia.