Well, keep us informed on what you have going on over there and with updates on your incredible mega-endowed babe-talent!
By the way, who is that hyper-hot titty queen in your avatar picture?? I sort of think it could be a young Tigerr Benson but I don't think so.
Her name is Chloe, I believe.
(08-21-2015, 07:21 PM)PinupFiles Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, that is our new discovery, Chloe, who is an all-natural J-cup.
http://tour.pinupfiles.com/video/chloe-p...t-studio-1
You all can look forward to a lot more from her very soon. 
She is incredible. Would love to see more of her. Same goes for your other new test studio model from a few weeks ago (Levi I think?).
I just wish PUF wasn't so "R-rated."
But maybe that's partly necessary to get certain girls to model.
(08-23-2015, 02:38 PM)bosomblaster Wrote: [ -> ]I just wish PUF wasn't so "R-rated."
But maybe that's partly necessary to get certain girls to model.
If I remember my history correctly, Pinup didn't start out as an "R" rated site. They were cheesecake, more like PG13. I think they made the move to nudity, as a business move. That's what got the customer's to buy, not necessarily what got the girls to model.
We were always a topless site from day one, that has never changed.
We don't do more explicit stuff because we would never be able to get the caliber of models we do, especially the exclusive ones, if that were not the case.
There's plenty of porn sites out there that cover that ground very well, so we really don't have any interest in trying to copy them and it would only hurt our business and brand if we did.
(08-25-2015, 07:53 PM)PinupFiles Wrote: [ -> ]We were always a topless site from day one, that has never changed.
We don't do more explicit stuff because we would never be able to get the caliber of models we do, especially the exclusive ones, if that were not the case.
There's plenty of porn sites out there that cover that ground very well, so we really don't have any interest in trying to copy them and it would only hurt our business and brand if we did.
Yes, and thank you for that!! I really respect Pinupfiles and it's not porn per se, it's tasteful human nudity.
Much like the many of our members, you appreciate the beauty and sexuality of women without feeling the need for exploitation.
That appeals to me. Other members are certainly welcome to be porn-dogs all they would like to, but they won't find it here.
(08-25-2015, 07:53 PM)PinupFiles Wrote: [ -> ]We were always a topless site from day one, that has never changed.
We don't do more explicit stuff because we would never be able to get the caliber of models we do, especially the exclusive ones, if that were not the case.
There's plenty of porn sites out there that cover that ground very well, so we really don't have any interest in trying to copy them and it would only hurt our business and brand if we did.
My mistake then... I guess I have my wires crossed.
Yes, I gotta give Pinupfiles my graditude as well. Those hosted my all time favorite models; Rachel, Leanne and September. I prefer topless modeling. Hardcore turns me off. That's just IMO.
So thanks Pinupfiles.
Now, back to topic, I have a question on Chloe, who can possibly rise to my top list based. That's based on only one video by the way. She has potential. But I was wondering why you airbrush her natural face and everything that comes with it. I think she has a mole left of her chin. And I don't think that should be edited.
I agree with you Royal, never been a fan of any hard core stuff the stuff Pinups do is just what I like
.
AD
