She gets my vote as the prettiest face of the 90's silicon superstars. Did a great vid w/ Rachel Rocketts and a couple hard cores with the same lucky guy. Then she disappeared but not from my memory!
(06-13-2017, 07:10 PM)andrucharm Wrote: [ -> ]She gets my vote as the prettiest face of the 90's silicon superstars. Did a great vid w/ Rachel Rocketts and a couple hard cores with the same lucky guy. Then she disappeared but not from my memory!
I've always felt that her & Busty Dusty were the prettiest of that period.
[b][size=4]Again.... PLEASE search first to see if we already have a thread on a model before starting a new one.[/b][/size]
Sorry but I did not see a previous thread on this Candy, probably time for me to stop posting
(06-14-2017, 01:55 PM)andrucharm Wrote: [ -> ]Sorry but I did not see a previous thread on this Candy, probably time for me to stop posting
Just check first. It's great to have a thread on every model, but one thread per model please.
It's better for everyone and does a better job for promoting and discussing.
Search
(06-14-2017, 02:23 PM)Bonecracker Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2017, 01:55 PM)andrucharm Wrote: [ -> ]Sorry but I did not see a previous thread on this Candy, probably time for me to stop posting
Just check first. It's great to have a thread on every model, but one thread per model please.
It's better for everyone and does a better job for promoting and discussing.
Search
Not trying to stir or anything but in OP's defence I just searched and could not find another topic on Candy C using Candy only as the search.
(06-13-2017, 07:10 PM)andrucharm Wrote: [ -> ]She gets my vote as the prettiest face of the 90's silicon superstars. Did a great vid w/ Rachel Rocketts and a couple hard cores with the same lucky guy. Then she disappeared but not from my memory!
She was one of my favorites back when it seemed like there were an infinite number of mega-silicone queens. I wish she did more hardcore though, and would have been awesome if she did one of the Boob Cruises. To be the main one sought after in "Booberella" really says something!
(06-14-2017, 09:42 PM)zappfra Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2017, 02:23 PM)Bonecracker Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2017, 01:55 PM)andrucharm Wrote: [ -> ]Sorry but I did not see a previous thread on this Candy, probably time for me to stop posting
Just check first. It's great to have a thread on every model, but one thread per model please.
It's better for everyone and does a better job for promoting and discussing.
Search
Not trying to stir or anything but in OP's defence I just searched and could not find another topic on Candy C using Candy only as the search.
Guys, no one gets mad or upset around here.
We all work together. In asking for using searches and keeping topics concise, is no indication of a tongue lashing or demerit points or infractions or that stuff.
We don't have a Palomino or Gonzo around here for a reason!! We don't want to be like that.
Don't confuse being OCD with being a control freak. Not the same thing. Love to ALL
(06-14-2017, 09:42 PM)zappfra Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2017, 02:23 PM)Bonecracker Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2017, 01:55 PM)andrucharm Wrote: [ -> ]Sorry but I did not see a previous thread on this Candy, probably time for me to stop posting
Just check first. It's great to have a thread on every model, but one thread per model please.
It's better for everyone and does a better job for promoting and discussing.
Search
Not trying to stir or anything but in OP's defence I just searched and could not find another topic on Candy C using Candy only as the search.
Same here... I keep searching for duplicate topics on Candy Samples, Cantaloupes, Colt 45 and others, and come up short. Maybe Bone is just quick to merge the topics together? Anyway, thanks to all for being vigilant on the matter.
(06-15-2017, 09:16 AM)Bonecracker Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2017, 09:42 PM)zappfra Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2017, 02:23 PM)Bonecracker Wrote: [ -> ]Just check first. It's great to have a thread on every model, but one thread per model please.
It's better for everyone and does a better job for promoting and discussing.
Search
Not trying to stir or anything but in OP's defence I just searched and could not find another topic on Candy C using Candy only as the search.
Guys, no one gets mad or upset around here.
We all work together. In asking for using searches and keeping topics concise, is no indication of a tongue lashing or demerit points or infractions or that stuff.
We don't have a Palomino or Gonzo around here for a reason!! We don't want to be like that.
Don't confuse being OCD with being a control freak. Not the same thing. Love to ALL
There is a name or 2 from the past, one in particular, that I am glad is in the rear view mirror.
Link photo here, is this one and the same CC ? Do not want to post think Getty might have more power than Palomine
http://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/new...id51989986
That's AWESOME!!
And I hope I never come across as one of those *control+freak types!
(06-17-2017, 10:12 PM)zappfra Wrote: [ -> ]Found this 1995 interview from CC which was an interesting read. Not sure but the Male opposite in Booberalla I think was likely the ex Husband (pig) http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/anot...er-6424214
115ZZZ? Sometimes I wish I could take Chelsea, Beshine, Lily and maybe a couple other entertainers back to silicone stuffed 1991, go up to whoever sets these measurements and be all "If Candy and Lulu are ZZZ, then how big is she?" Then they all enter the room one at a time in tune to that monolith music. I'm sure I'd wreck the timeline by doing that though.
We've come a long way, Twyla Tharp!