+- The Breast Enhancement Archive (https://forum.bearchive.co)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.bearchive.co/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: Celebrity and Model Discussion (https://forum.bearchive.co/forum-30.html)
+--- Thread: Chelsea Charms (/thread-892.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
RE: Chelsea Charms - TheRock1525 - 10-05-2017
A gentleman doesn't kiss and tell.
In public...
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-05-2017
(10-05-2017, 10:25 AM)TheRock1525 Wrote: A gentleman doesn't kiss and tell.
In public...
OK then... maybe not THOSE kinds of details!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-12-2017
New newsletter bonus pics are out!
RE: Chelsea Charms - raddypatty - 10-12-2017
those are some very nice pics!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-12-2017
(10-12-2017, 08:45 AM)raddypatty Wrote: those are some very nice pics!
The whole set is nice, raddypatty! Join her website to get all the pictures, news and videos... not just the samples we are allowed to share here!!
RE: Chelsea Charms - motorboatman - 10-19-2017
Do I dare ask what machine that is next to Chelsea in this pic?
RE: Chelsea Charms - Kopykat - 10-20-2017
If I'm not mistaken, I believe that is Inspector Gadget
RE: Chelsea Charms - ManofKent - 10-20-2017
Or Lee Majors.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Kopykat - 10-20-2017
^^^^ This guy gets it.
RE: Chelsea Charms - ManofKent - 10-21-2017
(06-22-2017, 12:03 AM)Bonecracker Wrote: p.S. Am I the only one disappointed that the green tube top still fits her?
(10-20-2017, 04:46 PM)Kopykat Wrote: ^^^^ This guy gets it.
Not as much has I like to!
RE: Chelsea Charms - lesbianbob - 10-22-2017
Can somebody explain why Chelsea's breasts look much less symmetrical in the flipped image on the left than in the original image on the right?
Originally I downloaded an image that looked like the left image and thought it had been intentionally distorted, but when I took the original and flipped it, the result was identical.
![[Image: 0ZAa8v5.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/0ZAa8v5.jpg)
RE: Chelsea Charms - Kopykat - 10-22-2017
Just hazarding a guess but I'd say maybe due to what our minds know about the placement of Chels areola in real life vs. what you saw in the mirrored image on the left. So when you flipped the image back to how it was originally shot on the right her left and right looked right. I think there's an Obama photo similar, where his inverted eyes which were upside down and the picture then flipped upside down made it look like he was frowning at first glance but upon rotating the picture upright viewers could see that he was smiling and the only thing altered in the photo was his eyes.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Boosterboobs - 10-23-2017
The Chelsea Charms breasts were never symmetrical; whenever she announced a new record in size she always has a bigger chest than the other, 500cc or 300 cc approximately. The implants of it are of PP and each breast can grow to different sizes (luck that it has not happened to him)
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-23-2017
(10-23-2017, 02:46 AM)Boosterboobs Wrote: The Chelsea Charms breasts were never symmetrical; whenever she announced a new record in size she always has a bigger chest than the other, 500cc or 300 cc approximately. The implants of it are of PP and each breast can grow to different sizes (luck that it has not happened to him)
You make a very good point. And it is indeed fortunate that they have grown in very similar amounts. She is the reigning queen of PPP. Arguably still a safer alternative than silicone shells filled with saltwater for breast augmentation.
Don't we all wish that there was someone somewhere performing the PPP implant procedures??
RE: Chelsea Charms - nitschke66 - 10-23-2017
(10-22-2017, 04:33 PM)lesbianbob Wrote: Can somebody explain why Chelsea's breasts look much less symmetrical in the flipped image on the left than in the original image on the right?Symmetry, who cares, just observe the SHEER MAGNITUDE of Itsy & Bitsy; Chelsea must be getting fewer drains. Probably, this can be attributed to her competition with Beshine for largest implants on planet earth.
Originally I downloaded an image that looked like the left image and thought it had been intentionally distorted, but when I took the original and flipped it, the result was identical.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-23-2017
I like the way @nitsche thinks!!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Boosterboobs - 10-24-2017
I dissent a bit with the size of Chelsea Charms in these last 2 years. in the black and white photo she is really HUGE possibly be photos made from the year 2014 when she said she reached 21,000 cc on each breast; in last videos videos in her photos in AVN 2016 and 2017 and other events to me did not seem shocking, she seemed to have a reduced or normal size (just have to see the black and white photos and buy with some AVN photo of the 2017, there is a big difference) I want to say that if AVN is in its largest size there are only 2 possible solutions. the first .... in the black and white photos there is a great effect of lenses. and the second possibility is she lies when she says she is huge and she is not. I begin ito suspect (I do not know where I read that his growth stopped many years ago) that his growth of PP has stopped.
RE: Chelsea Charms - motorboatman - 10-24-2017
(10-23-2017, 02:54 PM)nitschke66 Wrote:(10-22-2017, 04:33 PM)lesbianbob Wrote:Symmetry, who cares, just observe the SHEER MAGNITUDE of Itsy & Bitsy
So true! It's fricking amazing when you truly realize what she's capable of accomplishing when she goes longer without drains. I've seen many of her sizes in person and it's always baffling to see her one week and then a week or two later and the transformation that has happened. She's like a walking morph machine.
RE: Chelsea Charms - nitschke66 - 10-24-2017
(10-24-2017, 02:43 AM)Boosterboobs Wrote: I dissent a bit with the size of Chelsea Charms in these last 2 years. in the black and white photo she is really HUGE possibly be photos made from the year 2014 when she said she reached 21,000 cc on each breast; in last videos videos in her photos in AVN 2016 and 2017 and other events to me did not seem shocking, she seemed to have a reduced or normal size (just have to see the black and white photos and buy with some AVN photo of the 2017, there is a big difference) I want to say that if AVN is in its largest size there are only 2 possible solutions. the first .... in the black and white photos there is a great effect of lenses. and the second possibility is she lies when she says she is huge and she is not. I begin ito suspect (I do not know where I read that his growth stopped many years ago) that his growth of PP has stopped.
OBVIOUSLY, you haven't an unbiased opinion on the battle of the world's 2 largest enhanced women. Personally, I LOVE both & salivate & benefit from this INTENSE COMPETITION. Sadly though, I believe Chelsea will be the 1st to succumb because of Beshine's RELENTLESS & INTATIABLE DETERMINATION to be the most immense.
RE: Chelsea Charms - motorboatman - 10-24-2017
(09-14-2017, 10:31 PM)Bonecracker Wrote: This is just mind boggling... again
And Nitschke as much as I LOVVVVVVVVVVE this photo, expanding and growing to no end with many clothes left in her wake . . . I like her simpler stuff even more!
See the next box.
RE: Chelsea Charms - motorboatman - 10-24-2017
Yep.
RE: Chelsea Charms - nitschke66 - 10-24-2017
(10-24-2017, 03:28 PM)motorboatman Wrote: Yep.
No argument from me. I believe Chelsea is ADORABLE.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Boosterboobs - 10-25-2017
(10-24-2017, 03:14 PM)nitschke66 Wrote:(10-24-2017, 02:43 AM)Boosterboobs Wrote: I dissent a bit with the size of Chelsea Charms in these last 2 years. in the black and white photo she is really HUGE possibly be photos made from the year 2014 when she said she reached 21,000 cc on each breast; in last videos videos in her photos in AVN 2016 and 2017 and other events to me did not seem shocking, she seemed to have a reduced or normal size (just have to see the black and white photos and buy with some AVN photo of the 2017, there is a big difference) I want to say that if AVN is in its largest size there are only 2 possible solutions. the first .... in the black and white photos there is a great effect of lenses. and the second possibility is she lies when she says she is huge and she is not. I begin ito suspect (I do not know where I read that his growth stopped many years ago) that his growth of PP has stopped.
OBVIOUSLY, you haven't an unbiased opinion on the battle of the world's 2 largest enhanced women. Personally, I LOVE both & salivate & benefit from this INTENSE COMPETITION. Sadly though, I believe Chelsea will be the 1st to succumb because of Beshine's RELENTLESS & INTATIABLE DETERMINATION to be the most immense.
I try to say Chelsea in the photos (some photos) she looks huge but then you see the Chelsea video of the photos she does not look so big. I mean there is some kind of lens effect or the photos have been taken too close to look something bigger
RE: Chelsea Charms - motorboatman - 10-25-2017
(10-25-2017, 01:56 AM)Boosterboobs Wrote:(10-24-2017, 03:14 PM)nitschke66 Wrote:(10-24-2017, 02:43 AM)Boosterboobs Wrote: I dissent a bit with the size of Chelsea Charms in these last 2 years. in the black and white photo she is really HUGE possibly be photos made from the year 2014 when she said she reached 21,000 cc on each breast; in last videos videos in her photos in AVN 2016 and 2017 and other events to me did not seem shocking, she seemed to have a reduced or normal size (just have to see the black and white photos and buy with some AVN photo of the 2017, there is a big difference) I want to say that if AVN is in its largest size there are only 2 possible solutions. the first .... in the black and white photos there is a great effect of lenses. and the second possibility is she lies when she says she is huge and she is not. I begin ito suspect (I do not know where I read that his growth stopped many years ago) that his growth of PP has stopped.
I try to say Chelsea in the photos (some photos) she looks huge but then you see the Chelsea video of the photos she does not look so big. I mean there is some kind of lens effect or the photos have been taken too close to look something bigger
I've seen videos where she looks bigger in the videos than the pictures of the same outfits. She may be taking the photos and videos at different times which undoubtedly might reflect her drain schedule. She is so many sizes it's incredible. This string thing is truly remarkable!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-25-2017
(10-25-2017, 01:56 AM)Boosterboobs Wrote:And then you see her in real life and she looks even BIGGER!!(10-24-2017, 03:14 PM)nitschke66 Wrote:(10-24-2017, 02:43 AM)Boosterboobs Wrote: I dissent a bit with the size of Chelsea Charms in these last 2 years. in the black and white photo she is really HUGE possibly be photos made from the year 2014 when she said she reached 21,000 cc on each breast; in last videos videos in her photos in AVN 2016 and 2017 and other events to me did not seem shocking, she seemed to have a reduced or normal size (just have to see the black and white photos and buy with some AVN photo of the 2017, there is a big difference) I want to say that if AVN is in its largest size there are only 2 possible solutions. the first .... in the black and white photos there is a great effect of lenses. and the second possibility is she lies when she says she is huge and she is not. I begin ito suspect (I do not know where I read that his growth stopped many years ago) that his growth of PP has stopped.
OBVIOUSLY, you haven't an unbiased opinion on the battle of the world's 2 largest enhanced women. Personally, I LOVE both & salivate & benefit from this INTENSE COMPETITION. Sadly though, I believe Chelsea will be the 1st to succumb because of Beshine's RELENTLESS & INTATIABLE DETERMINATION to be the most immense.
I try to say Chelsea in the photos (some photos) she looks huge but then you see the Chelsea video of the photos she does not look so big. I mean there is some kind of lens effect or the photos have been taken too close to look something bigger