+- The Breast Enhancement Archive (https://forum.bearchive.co)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.bearchive.co/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: Celebrity and Model Discussion (https://forum.bearchive.co/forum-30.html)
+--- Thread: Chelsea Charms (/thread-892.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
RE: Chelsea Charms - titzling319 - 06-29-2013
The set was posted on PhotoClubs on 2-1-2013 and contains 50 images, 5 of which I posted in the Gallery on 4-6-2013, #1123-1127, pages 125-126.
RE: Chelsea Charms - jonas666 - 06-30-2013
Is the gallery deleted? ... I can't see any image ...
RE: Chelsea Charms - JustSomeone - 06-30-2013
The gallery is being recreated.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 07-01-2013
Good news everyone! "The Gallery is being recreated!"
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 07-02-2013
A very nice tweet from Chelsea:
[b][i]Chelsea Charms â€@chelseacharmsx 4h
@freefalldoom Well I've reached 15 to 15.5K so I guess 16 or 17 or 20Kcc would be possible. I haven't found a limit yet[/b][/i]
[hr]
Such an inspiring pose...
RE: Chelsea Charms - Djoser - 07-03-2013
Quote:Nice Tweet from her talking about her growth!
@chelseacharmsx: they can grow around 100-300cc per day depending on how big the latest drain is
Taken from the other site
RE: Chelsea Charms - sierra36 - 07-03-2013
Hi Chelsea lovers,
I am unable to access Chelsea's gallery. When I try the gallery I get an Oops page, it asks me for username and password, which when I give it says it's wrong. Is it me or the gallery? It's making me a little nuts!
Thanks to whoever can answer my question.
Sierra36
RE: Chelsea Charms - JustSomeone - 07-03-2013
The gallery is down ATM. Working on it.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 07-04-2013
New Chelsea Charms update... here are two samples. We really need to take up a collection and buy her a new hairbrush. LOL (Sorry Chels, just joking!)
RE: Chelsea Charms - Djoser - 07-05-2013
lol, well i like the projection of the pic on the left
RE: Chelsea Charms - Agent Dee - 07-05-2013
I like em both and I like her hair he he he.
AD
RE: Chelsea Charms - Articdonkey - 07-05-2013
That top is being stretched to within an inch of its life!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Agent Dee - 07-06-2013
(07-05-2013, 07:07 AM)Articdonkey Wrote: That top is being stretched to within an inch of its life!
Chelsea Charms: straining tops since 1999
AD
RE: Chelsea Charms - JustSomeone - 07-06-2013
Here is a picture of Chels from 1999. She was stretching tops waaay before that, it seems.
Also, her gallery is back up. Chels Gallery
![[Image: 1999%20Kleevco%20set%233%2031.jpg?m=1372991183]](http://gallery.bearchive.co/var/resizes/The-Women-of-BEA/Chelsea-Charms/1999%20Kleevco%20set%233%2031.jpg?m=1372991183)
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 07-07-2013
That's enough to make any straight man or gay woman as horny as all get out!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Djoser - 07-08-2013
She was supposedly a natural D cup, but there's no unequivocal evidence from that era (the only possible evidence is a possible morph where 'she's' 100% nude, honestly i think it was just a head swap)
RE: Chelsea Charms - Kopykat - 07-08-2013
You mean the b&w photo supposedly of her pre-implanted self? That's a total head swap.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Djoser - 07-10-2013
yes that one
now i wonder one thing, if she made full nude like that posted by JustSomeone, why she stopped doing them as she grew? :S
RE: Chelsea Charms - Articdonkey - 07-10-2013
When she first started out was she not part of Kayla Kleevage's production group? She may have been advised that full nudity was the way to go, after all the world had never witnessed boobs as big as hers. As she became familiar with industry she realised that she could make money without full nudity as people would pay to see her just doing topless shots. She may not have been comfortable doing full nudity. I do find it a shame that she doesn't show quite as much flesh as the old days, normally it's just her in jeans lifting up her shirt. I'm not saying she should do nude but some bikini and underwear shots would be good.
RE: Chelsea Charms - titzling319 - 07-10-2013
I was a subscriber to Kayla's Kleevco site in 1999 when she introduced the outstanding new talent known as Chelsea Charms...I was fuckin' blown away...it was love at first sight! I joined both ChelseaCharms.com and PhotoClubs as they came on the market and have cherished those early photosets ever since. Without doing a lot of research, I can say that she was still posing bottomless in 2001, maybe later.
One can see her snatch at any live show. I saw her at three different venues recently and she danced bottomless each time. However, when I was having Polaroids shot (15 for $150) I asked for some bottomless shots and she said she never does bottomless photography. I almost said, "Well, maybe not anymore" but I didn't want to get slapped or knocked over with her tits (Letha Weapons had the right idea but Chelsea perfected it).
I can hardly wait until September when Chelsea will be back in Lansing (only an hour away from me).
RE: Chelsea Charms - bosomblaster - 07-10-2013
(07-10-2013, 01:30 PM)titzling319 Wrote: I was a subscriber to Kayla's Kleevco site in 1999 when she introduced the outstanding new talent known as Chelsea Charms...I was fuckin' blown away...it was love at first sight! I joined both ChelseaCharms.com and PhotoClubs as they came on the market and have cherished those early photosets ever since. Without doing a lot of research, I can say that she was still posing bottomless in 2001, maybe later.
One can see her snatch at any live show. I saw her a three different venues recently and she danced bottomless each time. However, when I was having Polaroids shot (15 for $150) I asked for some bottomless shots and she said she never does bottomless photography. I almost said, "Well, maybe not anymore" but I didn't want to get slapped or knocked over with her tits (Letha Weapons had the right idea but Chelsea perfected it).
I can hardly wait until September when Chelsea will be back in Lansing (only an hour away from me).
That's great verbiage Titzling...truly made my day and harkened me back about 4 years ago when I was lucky enuff to enjoy a private Chels session. Her bottom was very much available, LOL!
I didn't even think of asking for pics however.Those were gr8 memories as well as gr8 MAMMARIES!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 07-10-2013
Maybe she only goes topless in photos now due to the increased scrutiny that is available with still photography? And you know, she's not in the shape she once was like during the "Changing Chelsea" era. But then again, most of us aren't!
RE: Chelsea Charms - titzling319 - 07-11-2013
Comparing Chelsea's waistline in current photos to older sets, it certainly appears that she is significantly thicker around the middle now. Sooo, I was pleasantly surprised, while seeing her in person for the first time, what great shape she was in (NOTE: great shape for a 36 year old, obviously not the same great shape as the 25, or so, year old in "Changing Chelsea"). As I have previously reported, I seem to remember that for a couple of years she didn't perform at all but only gave Private Dances, at least according to her schedule posted in ChelseaCharms.com which I checked on a regular basis (always hoping that she'd appear somewhere in Michigan). I had assumed that she didn't want to perform in this "heavy" condition.
At any rate, I tried to compliment her on getting back into such great shape and she didn't appear to understand what I was referring to. She claimed that she'd never, ever been out of shape.
I can't explain it but she continues to look bigger around the middle in recent photosets than she does in person. Also, not only does she look great but she seems to be in great condition since she does a great deal of climbing on tables and other physically demanding maneuvers while on stage.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Djoser - 07-11-2013
(07-11-2013, 05:56 PM)titzling319 Wrote: (NOTE: great shape for a 36 year old, obviously not the same great shape as the 25, or so, year old in "Changing Chelsea")
Hmm I have to say a big but here, some fitness women get at their peak shape after the 30's even after having children, so your argument can't be valid in many instances...not complaining just saying!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 07-12-2013
I think Titzling is stating the obvious. She has definitely appeared "thick" for some time now. A constant complaint of mine, I know, especially in the post-drain photos. But would I be content with her in my life day after day, night after night? Hells to the Y E S. She's a goddess through and through and we mere mortal men merely hold the standard high for our queen!