+- The Breast Enhancement Archive (https://forum.bearchive.co)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.bearchive.co/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: Celebrity and Model Discussion (https://forum.bearchive.co/forum-30.html)
+--- Thread: Chelsea Charms (/thread-892.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
RE: Chelsea Charms - Djoser - 12-20-2013
And to all who have shared her encountes of the huge kind, thanks a lot!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 12-21-2013
SPeechless!!
RE: Chelsea Charms - SuperEZ - 12-22-2013
(12-10-2013, 10:25 AM)addy2000 Wrote: Around bust was a bit over 66" , protrusion? was about 10.5 and circumference was 34".
Not major differences by any means, just goes to show that they fluctuate in size (and makes me speculate she has a "preferred" size range, probably due to practical reasons with clothing).
Based on these measurements, particularly the circumference one, I have calculated that Chelsea was approximately 10,500ccs, assuming you measured accurately. I used the formula for finding the volume of a sphere, and I do realize that Chelsea's breasts are not perfect spheres, but the formula should give you a very approximate size. At 34 inches, her breasts should be about 10.8 inches in diameter or, 27.5 cm in diameter. For Chelsea to reach the 20,000ccs we all dream of, one breast would need to measure about 13.5 inches in diameter, or about 34 cm. At 20,000ccs, one breast would be about 42 inches in circumference, or 107 cm.
RE: Chelsea Charms - andrat2000 - 12-22-2013
(12-22-2013, 03:23 AM)SuperEZ Wrote:(12-10-2013, 10:25 AM)addy2000 Wrote: Around bust was a bit over 66" , protrusion? was about 10.5 and circumference was 34".
Not major differences by any means, just goes to show that they fluctuate in size (and makes me speculate she has a "preferred" size range, probably due to practical reasons with clothing).
Based on these measurements, particularly the circumference one, I have calculated that Chelsea was approximately 10,500ccs, assuming you measured accurately. I used the formula for finding the volume of a sphere, and I do realize that Chelsea's breasts are not perfect spheres, but the formula should give you a very approximate size. At 34 inches, her breasts should be about 10.8 inches in diameter or, 27.5 cm in diameter.
You calculated it very good for a sphere, I'm at 10,800 cc for the 10.8 inches diameter. Since the diameter of circumference 10.8 inches and protrusion 10.5 inches is about the same, calculation with a sphere is quite reasonable. Maybe her base where her breast is attached to the upper body is a little bit bigger than the outer curves of a sphere you may add 1500 - 2000 ccm, which would bring her to ~12,500 - 13,000 cc's.
RE: Chelsea Charms - addy2000 - 12-22-2013
Id say that sounds reasonable Andrat, she was definitely quite a lot bigger than in the good old 10K pics
RE: Chelsea Charms - SuperEZ - 12-23-2013
(12-22-2013, 05:50 AM)andrat2000 Wrote:(12-22-2013, 03:23 AM)SuperEZ Wrote:(12-10-2013, 10:25 AM)addy2000 Wrote: Around bust was a bit over 66" , protrusion? was about 10.5 and circumference was 34".
Not major differences by any means, just goes to show that they fluctuate in size (and makes me speculate she has a "preferred" size range, probably due to practical reasons with clothing).
Based on these measurements, particularly the circumference one, I have calculated that Chelsea was approximately 10,500ccs, assuming you measured accurately. I used the formula for finding the volume of a sphere, and I do realize that Chelsea's breasts are not perfect spheres, but the formula should give you a very approximate size. At 34 inches, her breasts should be about 10.8 inches in diameter or, 27.5 cm in diameter.
You calculated it very good for a sphere, I'm at 10,800 cc for the 10.8 inches diameter. Since the diameter of circumference 10.8 inches and protrusion 10.5 inches is about the same, calculation with a sphere is quite reasonable. Maybe her base where her breast is attached to the upper body is a little bit bigger than the outer curves of a sphere you may add 1500 - 2000 ccm, which would bring her to ~12,500 - 13,000 cc's.
I redid my calculations and came up with 10,795.86ccs. I also did the formula for the volume of a cylinder, suppose if Chelsea was to let her breasts hang straight down, they would look more like a cylinder than a sphere. So based again on addy2000's measurements I came up with this, a whopping, 15,819.86ccs! But as you stated, the diameter being nearly equal to the protrusion measurement, her breasts should be pretty close to being a sphere. I've always thought her cc measurements were a little exaggerated, but two different methods of calculating came up with two very different numbers of volume.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Agent Dee - 12-23-2013
These numbers really only mean one thing, she has HUGE FREAKING BOOBS!!!
AD
RE: Chelsea Charms - SuperEZ - 12-23-2013
(12-23-2013, 02:33 AM)Agent Dee Wrote: These numbers really only mean one thing, she has HUGE FREAKING BOOBS!!!
AD
I like having these numbers to go by, as I am a precise guy, and like to be precise, and know measurements and volume of things, particularly Chelsea's breasts. It is reassuring to me, and puts into perspective how massive she really is.
RE: Chelsea Charms - addy2000 - 12-24-2013
I agree EZ (there is a reason I wanted to measure
) but like others have pointed out, it's hard to fathom just how big they are before you see them in person, so to speak.
RE: Chelsea Charms - titzling319 - 12-24-2013
I've added some random images starting with #3410 on page 379. Please excuse the duplicates and fuzzy shots. I've also posted a classic set from 2002. It shows Chelsea in a Pink tank top and lavender (lilac?) pants.
While posting these shots, I often stopped and studied some of the more remarkable photos (something I don't do often enough!). My God, this woman is beautiful! And, even in ten year old pics, her breasts appear massive beyond all understanding. As huge as they appear in these photos, you must, as addy2000 just stated, you really must see them in the flesh to fully comprehend how massive they truly are!
![[Image: 2004%20Chelsea%20%26%20Friends%204.jpg?m=1387913896]](http://gallery.bearchive.co/var/resizes/The-Women-of-BEA/Chelsea-Charms/2004%20Chelsea%20%26%20Friends%204.jpg?m=1387913896)
Chelsea with T, Crystal Gunns and Maxi Mounds!
![[Image: 2002%20Pink%20Tank%2031.jpg?m=1387917494]](http://gallery.bearchive.co/var/resizes/The-Women-of-BEA/Chelsea-Charms/2002%20Pink%20Tank%2031.jpg?m=1387917494)
From 2002!
RE: Chelsea Charms - addy2000 - 12-25-2013
Yeah, It's not hard to imagine that they are heavy, but until you've tried to lift them........Im impressed she manages to even walk around with those megatits. She must have back muscles on par with any female powerlifter.
RE: Chelsea Charms - silverleaf33 - 12-25-2013
Where does one find this #3410 page 379?
RE: Chelsea Charms - JustSomeone - 12-25-2013
(12-25-2013, 04:51 PM)silverleaf33 Wrote: Where does one find this #3410 page 379?You must be new here, Mr 1 post.
http://gallery.bearchive.co/index.php/The-Women-of-BEA/Chelsea-Charms?page=379
RE: Chelsea Charms - Agent Dee - 12-26-2013
I said it before and I will say it again, I LOVE her monster boobs
AD
RE: Chelsea Charms - titzling319 - 12-26-2013
How to locate a specific page in a model's gallery:
While viewing any given page in a model's gallery (a page with many images), the site address will look something like this:
http://gallery.bearchive.co/index.php/The-Women-of-BEA/Chelsea-Charms?page=392
The "page=392" indicates that you are viewing page 392. To move from page 392 to, say, page 85, use your curser to replace the 392 with 85 and hit enter. You will be whisked to page 85.
RE: Chelsea Charms - mikey86 - 12-26-2013
Just a little something from last night!
[hr]
(12-26-2013, 10:19 AM)mikey86 Wrote: Just a little something from last night!
I have other photos to add that are too big to attach to a post but cannot post to the gallery. Can someone tell me how? Am I even allowed do so?
[hr]
Another. Hope you like!
RE: Chelsea Charms - addy2000 - 12-26-2013
(12-26-2013, 04:21 AM)Agent Dee Wrote: I said it before and I will say it again, I LOVE her monster boobsYou and me both buddy!
AD
[hr]
(12-26-2013, 10:19 AM)mikey86 Wrote: Just a little something from last night![hr]
You haven't been alive until you've have Chelseas incredible gigantic tits on your face ;P
RE: Chelsea Charms - Agent Dee - 12-26-2013
I envy the hell out of those who have
AD
RE: Chelsea Charms - SuperEZ - 12-27-2013
(12-25-2013, 11:13 AM)addy2000 Wrote: Yeah, It's not hard to imagine that they are heavy, but until you've tried to lift them........Im impressed she manages to even walk around with those megatits. She must have back muscles on par with any female powerlifter.
I've had the opportunity to lift Chelsea's breasts, and found them to be not as heavy as one might think. I had a picture taken with her, and was standing behind her when I was lifting her breasts up. It took some effort, but not as much as I thought it would, basing it on Chelsea's advertised 31 pounds a piece, at least that's what is listed on her website. I did some figuring, and based on the 10,800ccs number that was established in earlier posts, came up with each breast weighing approximately 23.62 pounds. But when I was lifting her breasts, I was not lifting the entire breast either, so that may account for what I perceived as a less than expected weight.
RE: Chelsea Charms - mikey86 - 12-27-2013
Addy and SuperEz I really really envy you!
RE: Chelsea Charms - loucar1986 - 12-27-2013
Good grief she looks massive in that second pic
RE: Chelsea Charms - helogos - 12-27-2013
(12-27-2013, 12:29 PM)loucar1986 Wrote: Good grief she looks massive in that second picSorry but it´s a morph.
......now! but who knows, she is famous for outgrowing morphs.
RE: Chelsea Charms - mikey86 - 12-27-2013
Can anyone tell me how, or if, I can post to the gallery?
RE: Chelsea Charms - addy2000 - 12-27-2013
I'd envy me too Mikey
EZ, as you pointed out, they are attached to her, so that "helps". And even if they are "just" 23 pounds each, thats still a lot of tit to carry around 24/7...
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 12-27-2013
[b][size=4][color=purple] The Greatest Chelsea Charms documentary film ever made.[/b][/color][/size]