+- The Breast Enhancement Archive (https://forum.bearchive.co)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.bearchive.co/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: Celebrity and Model Discussion (https://forum.bearchive.co/forum-30.html)
+--- Thread: Chelsea Charms (/thread-892.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
RE: Chelsea Charms - Agent Dee - 10-02-2014
I wanna see the movie, exclamation point
AD
RE: Chelsea Charms - ManofKent - 10-02-2014
(09-10-2014, 01:22 PM)motorboatman Wrote:There's been a lot of talk about the anticipation of her reaching the fabled 20K mark on here, and the way it's going I guess it's only a matter of time before she reaches that landmark.(09-10-2014, 09:45 AM)Bonecracker Wrote: That's IF she is realy at 18K which I am somewhat dubious about. Looks more like 14K to me. I'm waiting for her to break the 20K barrier... I actually shake in nervous anticipation when I think about it. Then I can't stand for about 20 minutes afterwards because my pants are too tight.
Yeah in the older photo shown probably closer to 14 or 15K if I recall.
[b]Most recently she reported going to 18K, I think about a month ago. Not sure how many times she's been to that world record breaking number this year. It seems to be almost effortless now for her, the growing process. But I'm thinking it's probably more difficult than we can imagine.[/b]
BUT, there is just one thing that I've wanting to say for a long time, and it's this:
Could someone PLEASE give this woman a TAPEMEASURE?
If it's one (minor) gripe that I have towards super-endowed woman like Chelsea, Minka, Beshine etc is that I would so much love to see her/them actually MEASURING themselves in front of the camera for us.
I would just so much love to see the actual size of her for myself, in actual inches/centimetres, especially Chelsea who just seems to keep bigger and bigger and bigger....
According to Boobpedia she's about 72" or so (which is astonishing considering that she's only 5'2" high-she's bigger round the bust then she is tall!
).Please can we one day see her measuring her chest, thus showing us the fans the sheer SIZE of her chest for ourselves?
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-02-2014
When I was a kid, every one said that 36-24-36 was the ideal measurement. That's 3 feet, 2 feet, 3 feet.
I love this new metric of 72 24 36. That's 6 feet, 2 feet, 3 feet.
How I wish there were more like her!!
RE: Chelsea Charms - nitschke66 - 10-02-2014
(10-02-2014, 07:20 AM)ManofKent Wrote:I wholeheartedly concur. Actually, that 72" posting on Boobpedia is quite old. I believe she's larger than that now. Beshine claims to be 79.54" , which I profoundly doubt this claim.(09-10-2014, 01:22 PM)motorboatman Wrote:There's been a lot of talk about the anticipation of her reaching the fabled 20K mark on here, and the way it's going I guess it's only a matter of time before she reaches that landmark.(09-10-2014, 09:45 AM)Bonecracker Wrote: That's IF she is realy at 18K which I am somewhat dubious about. Looks more like 14K to me. I'm waiting for her to break the 20K barrier... I actually shake in nervous anticipation when I think about it. Then I can't stand for about 20 minutes afterwards because my pants are too tight.
Yeah in the older photo shown probably closer to 14 or 15K if I recall.
[b]Most recently she reported going to 18K, I think about a month ago. Not sure how many times she's been to that world record breaking number this year. It seems to be almost effortless now for her, the growing process. But I'm thinking it's probably more difficult than we can imagine.[/b]
BUT, there is just one thing that I've wanting to say for a long time, and it's this:
Could someone PLEASE give this woman a TAPEMEASURE?
If it's one (minor) gripe that I have towards super-endowed woman like Chelsea, Minka, Beshine etc is that I would so much love to see her/them actually MEASURING themselves in front of the camera for us.
I would just so much love to see the actual size of her for myself, in actual inches/centimetres, especially Chelsea who just seems to keep bigger and bigger and bigger....
According to Boobpedia she's about 72" or so (which is astonishing considering that she's only 5'2" high-she's bigger round the bust then she is tall!
Please can we one day see her measuring her chest, thus showing us the fans the sheer SIZE of her chest for ourselves?
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-02-2014
Yes, hypothetically, I'd have to grow 8 feet of arms to give her a proper all-encompasing hug. A woman likes to feel held, ya know!
RE: Chelsea Charms - andrat2000 - 10-02-2014
you guys are too technical - be more pragmatic. Beshine once in a camshow mentioned that arms are too short to be able to reach completely around her. My answer was I would stick my head between the boobs and hug completely her tiny wasp waist instead - problem solved.
And so would I do it with CC. No need to grow eight feet arms.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Agent Dee - 10-04-2014
(10-01-2014, 09:33 AM)andrat2000 Wrote:
![[Image: BVqpnUDCAAASFRo.jpg:large]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BVqpnUDCAAASFRo.jpg:large)
I was digging through my archives and here is Chelsea in that same top shot about 8/9 years ago back when she could button it up, no way in HELL she can do that anymore.
![[Image: x5a004.jpg]](http://filefap.com/files/636114_axxaa/x5a004.jpg)
Agent "talk about a night and day difference" Dee
RE: Chelsea Charms - ussername - 10-04-2014
those pics are taken in a different way with different lenses...that bigger pic dont appeal me at all. it "bubbles" like looking at myself on a "circus" mirror lol
RE: Chelsea Charms - andrat2000 - 10-04-2014
Ussername, can we please stop this discussion? By now, we already understood your point and by the way you made it already to the same pic: http://forum.bearchive.co/thread-13-post-8493.html#pid8493
And finally this comment led to the situation that following posts got deleted. Why should we want to have this happen again?
RE: Chelsea Charms - helogos - 10-04-2014
(10-04-2014, 02:22 PM)andrat2000 Wrote: Ussername, can we please stop this discussion? By now, we already understood your point and by the way you made it already to the same pic: http://forum.bearchive.co/thread-13-post-8493.html#pid8493
And finally this comment led to the situation that following posts got deleted. Why should we want to have this happen again?
What he said.
Just keep negative things to your self. I thought this was a fan board.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-04-2014
Yeah, watch it. You're talking about one of my fantasy wives there!!
New photo set out, part 2 of an earlier set (from this year). My baby looks great in it too!! Got her all hair all 'did' and everything!
RE: Chelsea Charms - nitschke66 - 10-04-2014
(10-04-2014, 03:03 PM)Bonecracker Wrote: Yeah, watch it. You're talking about one of my fantasy wives there!!After all these yrs., Chelsea is a BEAUTIFUL now as back in 1999.
New photo set out, part 2 of an earlier set (from this year). My baby looks great in it too!! Got her all hair all 'did' and everything!
RE: Chelsea Charms - ManofKent - 10-05-2014
(10-02-2014, 08:22 AM)Bonecracker Wrote: When I was a kid, every one said that 36-24-36 was the ideal measurement. That's 3 feet, 2 feet, 3 feet.
I love this new metric of 72 24 36. That's 6 feet, 2 feet, 3 feet.
How I wish there were more like her!!
What's really going to blow your mind with Chelsea is when you do the maths.
We all know that her implants grow about 25mm a month, which is about 1" a month.
BUT, the thing is she got her string implants in about 2000.
That's 14 years ago.
Or, to put it another way, about [i]168 MONTHS[/i]!
And if their growing 1" a month, that, in total, would be....[i]168"[/i]
In total, without her regular drains, that would be the equivalent to [i]14ft![/i] of almost continuous expansion (without drains, that is).
Add to that the size she was BEFORE her string implants (a H cup I think) and we're probably talking about nearly [i]18ft[/i] now!
That, when you think about it, is literally breathtaking!
That is just the stuff of pure FANTASY now!They would look like weather balloons or something!
I literally can't visualise what that would have looked like in reality (if it had actually worked, and the laws of physics/human physiology didn't apply).
Obviously, in the real world it wouldn't have worked like that, but if it had it would be like a Morph or something.
If only...
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-05-2014
There's only one slight problem with your theory... Girls who didn't get drained, stopped growing.
Chelsea's growth may be likely contributed partially to her drains as it gives her skin a chance to stretch out before the next growth cycle. That's my theory!
RE: Chelsea Charms - motorboatman - 10-05-2014
(10-04-2014, 02:39 AM)Agent Dee Wrote:(10-01-2014, 09:33 AM)andrat2000 Wrote:
I was digging through my archives and here is Chelsea in that same top shot about 8/9 years ago back when she could button it up, no way in HELL she can do that anymore.
Agent "talk about a night and day difference" Dee
Her continued non-stop steady growth is frankly amazing!!! From 3k to 18K+ and a lot of fun along the way!!!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Chelseafan79 - 10-09-2014
Found this on twitter
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x27lzdb_chelsea-charms-oct-8th-11th-wed-sat_people
RE: Chelsea Charms - andrat2000 - 10-09-2014
(10-09-2014, 12:51 PM)Chelseafan79 Wrote: Found this on twitter
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x27lzdb_chelsea-charms-oct-8th-11th-wed-sat_people
Great find Chelseafan79! It is A-M-A-Z-I-N-G.
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-09-2014
VERY NICE!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-11-2014
Love a good candid, don't you?
[hr]
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-12-2014
New Chelsea video out!
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-20-2014
New photo set out!!
[hr]
Maybe more to follow
RE: Chelsea Charms - chigzoie - 10-21-2014
(10-20-2014, 11:43 PM)Bonecracker Wrote: New photo set out!!can we get some samples?
[hr]
Maybe more to follow
RE: Chelsea Charms - andrat2000 - 10-22-2014
Do you see the sample above?
RE: Chelsea Charms - Bonecracker - 10-22-2014
Ok, another sample of the set... clearly, she had a drain done before this set as her boobs aren't as bulbous as in the last update.
And the second photo is from a recent show, it's an autographed older photo from about 2003-2004. Perhaps my favorite Chelsea era!
RE: Chelsea Charms - nitschke66 - 10-22-2014
(10-22-2014, 08:56 AM)andrat2000 Wrote: Do you see the sample above?
That, I profoundly believe, was taken post drain & look how immense she still remains.