Chelsea Charms

[titzling319]

I've removed several hundred duplicate images of Chelsea from her Gallery and added 21 new shots from her Archives.

[Bonecracker]

Thanks, titzling!

[addy2000]

One can always hope Bonecracker! I am sure I won't mind if they are the size of medicine balls

[titzling319]

I just posted 130 images of Chelsea from various sets over the years. There's a problem...they are spread all over Chelsea's Gallery.
PAGE 133

PAGE 59

Other sets on pages 30, 58, 65, 100, 105, 116, 121, 122, 162, 179.

[addy2000]

The effort is still appreciated Titzling! Even by those of us who have most of them already

[titzling319]

addy2000, Thanks for the kind words! I post old photo sets for several reasons:
A large percentage of our members are almost certainly younger guys who have never seen these sets before.
Once in a while I post an entire set that's at least ten years old such as the "Camping, Lake Superior" set (page 58) from 2001. Almost always, someone will note that they had lost said set or maybe never had the entire set.
Best of all, isn't it fun to look at ANY images of Chelsea, if she's bigger or smaller, younger or more mature?

[lonewolf988]

I always appreciate any image I can get

[Rickypym]

Thank you so much titzling! I have never seen the camping photos.

[JustSomeone]

Titzling, the photos are ordered by the file name. You can change this to order uploaded.

[titzling319]

That actually occurred to me but I didn't follow through checking. Thanks for the heads-up!

[titzling319]

YES! I reorganized my posts so they now appear in the order that I post them (newer pics in the back). This latest group (from 10-12-13) starts at #2267 on page 252. I'll be posting another group later today.
Sorry for all the confusion...thank JustSomeone for showing me the correct path!

[Agent Dee]

That last one is insane O.O.

AD

[wangchungman14]

wait, am i doing something wrong because i don't see the new photos at the end, it still finishes with her dejavu photos

[addy2000]

Well gentlemen, I had the pleasure of meeting Chelsea yesterday. Is she record big atm? no. Does she still have very VERY big boobs? yes And let's face it, only in a world with Chelsea in it would a 66 inch bust be considered less than the biggest...
Also, she is a very sweet lady, as many have pointed out before

[titzling319]

I posted 115 images of Chelsea in her Gallery. Some are taken from sets dating back to 2000, some are from recent Archives.
Beginning with image #2456 on page 273, you'll find a 28 pic set, "Ladies Orgy" (2001) featuring Chelsea with Kayla Kleevage, Minka and an unknown Asian model. This must have been a "Pay to watch" performance as I count at least 23 guys watching and taking pictures. This begs the question, "12 years later...where are the images taken that night?" There must have been hundreds of shots taken. Sure, they all probably signed a form vowing that they would never release these pics to the public (I signed one on the Boob Cruise...I lied!). Hard to believe that not even one guy has released even one photo.


[hr]

Well gentlemen, I had the pleasure of meeting Chelsea yesterday. Is she record big atm? no. Does she still have very VERY big boobs? yes And let's face it, only in a world with Chelsea in it would a 66 inch bust be considered less than the biggest...
Also, she is a very sweet lady, as many have pointed out before

DETAILS, man, DETAILS! We don't expect you to kiss-and-tell everything but you must realize that the rest of us are living vicariously thru you and are hanging on your every word of the time spent with our Sweet Goddess!

[Agent Dee]

FYI 66" is 4 inches bigger around than she is tall, yes, Chelsea bust measurement is bigger than her, how awesome is that?!

AD

[Bonecracker]

The cool thing about this photo is this was the only instance where Chelsea and Minka were photographed together with Minka being slightly larger than Chelsea.

This photo was taken at Chelsea's 1999 Expo debut, and she has never been this small since! (and pray God she never is again! LOL)

[Bonecracker]

Closer on 80 during the Finnish Turku Sex Fest event last year, I believe.... or was that the year before?

[titzling319]

I posted 76 images in Chelsea's Gallery. #2536 starts her latest PhotoSet from PhotoClubs. After some misc. pics, I added some old magazine scans I came across. I find those old mag scans to be quite hot even if she was only about half the size she is today.

[addy2000]

Close to 80 sounds like a lot... She is damn big already at 66
Cant give you any details about dance, but i can tell you the circumference of her boobs is about 31 inches!
Also, in Dee's latest post in "you know you got big boobs", that blue shirt just baaaarely fit now.

[Bonecracker]

Thanks for the latest photoclubs samples! That dark blue tube top underneath the "impossible to button pink shirt" is the bomb!

[Djoser]

man, i still wonder why did she stop doing full nudes.

[addy2000]

I had thought to ask her about that (if it was because she simply didn't want to) when meeting her, but I got distracted ;P

[titzling319]

Funny how that happens when you're, um, talking to Chelsea and...now what was I going to say?

Actually, I asked for a couple shots with her skirt off while I was having 15 Polaroids taken and I thought she was gonna slug me. "I don't do bottomless!" she told me in no uncertain terms. I almost said, "But, you just did on stage!" I then decided that that might be pushing my luck.

[Agent Dee]

Great tweet from Chelsea:
Feeling incredibly busty this morning! Great way to start off the week

AD