Chelsea Charms

[Bonecracker]

More additions to the May/June newsletter. Thus, another OFFICIAL sample for you lot of swarthy swine.

[Shadow]

I would love to see pictures of her topless when here boobs are filled to this size! did she reached 16000cc?

[Bonecracker]

They are out there. Of course, for less than $15 a month, you can join her site and see everything!!

[appleton]

Love Chelsea Charms to death but her photos/videos are really sub-par in my opinion. I have read folks clamoring for high def and more frequent updates.

Personally, I'd be fine with standard def/fewer updates if more pictures were actually in focus (see above as Exhibit A of blurriness) and there were fewer pictures of her yawning, looking bored, or drinking a glass of water. Not too mention that some pictures are taken so close up if you just came upon it by accident without any context it would probably take a long while to determine what the picture was of (if at all). Also fun photo art does not make a bad photo good it just makes it look all the more amateurish, which I guess is what you get for the price you pay to her site.

Personally I'd rather she focus first on quality over higher definition/frequency otherwise we just get poor quality in greater detail.

[Bonecracker]

More updates???? CC and Cube have it going on now!! 9 new updates this month alone.

No one comes even close to that now. She used to be slack with doing that but you can't fault her anymore. And with regards to the quality??

I HATE HIGH DEF. It makes every pore in a woman's skin look big enough to put a pencil in. I think the quality is good the way it is and I also like all the real-life candids she is giving her fans these days.

[andrat2000]

More updates???? CC and Cube have it going on now!! 9 new updates this month alone.

No one comes even close to that now. She used to be slack with doing that but you can't fault her anymore. And with regards to the quality??

I HATE HIGH DEF. It makes every pore in a woman's skin look big enough to put a pencil in. I think the quality is good the way it is and I also like all the real-life candids she is giving her fans these days.

Other people other opinions about photographic features.

I did contribute objective informations to the photographic topic some days back on subject of the website. There wasn't even one single complaint included, not even one wrong statement or wrong accusation - just facts out of the picture files. I corrected wrong complaints of other users that where obviously not correct. My whole text got butchered into Nirvana.

[man_in_space]

I HATE HIGH DEF. It makes every pore in a woman's skin look big enough to put a pencil in. I think the quality is good the way it is

I absolutely agree. Made a similar point few pages back.

[appleton]

I really couldn't care less about high def vs. standard def. Given that Chelsea is now over 40 years old I don't blame her for preferring standard def.

I try not to conflate quality for quantity and therefore am really not influenced by 9 updates per month if said updates are of low quality.

To use a metaphor, I'd prefer to be served fewer "soup sandwiches" and more gourmet sandwiches...ha! (NOTE: this is an exaggeration to make a point; also those unfamiliar with the term "soup sandwich" need only look at Urban Dictionary for the definition).

All this is just my opinion and I respect that others may not be as critical as myself. That being said, I am a member of her site because I find the quality to be "good enough" to justify the cost. I just wish the updates focused more on quality rather than quantity. The believe the best part of Chelsea's site is her newsletter and hope she keeps it up.

[Agent Dee]

FYI Chelsea is NOT over 40 years old she was born in 76 so she is not even 40 yet

AD

[appleton]

FYI Chelsea is NOT over 40 years old she was born in 76 so she is not even 40 yet

AD

Yes, and a woman has never lied about her age... :-) Believe what you will, it's no skin off my nose

[Bonecracker]

FYI Chelsea is NOT over 40 years old she was born in 76 so she is not even 40 yet

AD

Yes, and a woman has never lied about her age... :-) Believe what you will, it's no skin off my nose

It;'s quite true, actually. She really is 38 and is supposedly retiring when she turns 40.

[appleton]

FYI Chelsea is NOT over 40 years old she was born in 76 so she is not even 40 yet

AD

Yes, and a woman has never lied about her age... :-) Believe what you will, it's no skin off my nose

It;'s quite true, actually. She really is 38 and is supposedly retiring when she turns 40.

Interesting that you just made a statement that exposes 2 premises. The latter of which (her retirement age) I presume was made to add validity to the former (her current age). However if the former (her current age) is in fact incorrect and she's actually 41, doesn't that invalidate your latter statement?

Regardless, it really misses the point that she is advancing in years and therefore I don't blame her for not wanting to go full high def.

[Bonecracker]

For the love of boobs, mate, for those of us who have been following her since 1999, 15 years ago, her age has always been known. Besides, I have a personal connection to her and can attest to her age. If I'm wrong, I've been fooled by everyone including Uncle Sam. Do you get what I'm saying here? Do you know what I mean? Are you picking up what I'm laying down? Can you dig it? I'm not blowing smoke up yer arse, I'm telling you I [u]know[/u] (not think or speculate) she was born 7 March 1976.

As for her retirement age, she said some time ago that she didn't wish to be doing this past 40... but would continue with the website and online content. Who can blame a woman for that? That's nearly 22 years of working in that industry. And carrying around 60 lbs of boobs? That's a lot of daily weight on your shoulders, pardon the pun.

[b]So, God Bless You, Chels, and thanks for all the inspiration over the years... I know you're reading this and despite our wee quarrels over the years, I love ya to pieces! [/b]

[Agent Dee]

hear hear!



AD

[Archaon]

As for her retirement age, she said some time ago that she didn't wish to be doing this past 40... but would continue with the website and online content. Who can blame a woman for that? That's nearly 22 years of working in that industry. And carrying around 60 lbs of boobs? That's a lot of daily weight on your shoulders, pardon the pun.

I can certainly see the touring, dancing etc being exhausting and just getting too much after a while - with or without her huge breasts! I imagine 'just' doing website content and maybe the odd expo appearance would be a much more comfortable workload, and a good compromise between her current schedule and a full-on retirement.

If that's the case then I hope the more relaxed lifestyle suits her and allows this lovely lady to maintain her presence for longer.

[ManofKent]

As for her retirement age, she said some time ago that she didn't wish to be doing this past 40... but would continue with the website and online content. Who can blame a woman for that? That's nearly 22 years of working in that industry. And carrying around 60 lbs of boobs? That's a lot of daily weight on your shoulders, pardon the pun.

I can certainly see the touring, dancing etc being exhausting and just getting too much after a while - with or without her huge breasts! I imagine 'just' doing website content and maybe the odd expo appearance would be a much more comfortable workload, and a good compromise between her current schedule and a full-on retirement.

If that's the case then I hope the more relaxed lifestyle suits her and allows this lovely lady to maintain her presence for longer.

Am I the only one who finds this conversation slightly depressing?

It does raise a very good question for us big boob fans-exactly how long will she keep going?

Giving her age, and assuming what's been said about her reeling back her work schedule after 40 is true, that does that mean that we Chelsea fans have only a few years left to enjoy her amazing presence?

Please don't think I'm criticising her or anything-she has given us about 15 years of great pleasure and delight, that I kinda feel that she really is one of a kind, and no disrespect towards other models like Beshine, there was something about Chelsea that really catches people's eye.

There are, and have been, many big breast models other the years, like Minka, Sarenna Lee, Tiffany Towers, Pandora Peaks, Tawny Peaks, etc, among many.
BUT, here's the thing-although they're all really big, nothing simply compares to Chelsea in terms of sheer size and scale of her breasts (I've seen pictures of her and Chelsea together, and although Minka is pretty big-she once said they were "the size of basketballs"-Chelsea's chest is WAY bigger even then that!).

Chelsea really is, in most people's opinion, a league of her own, because her breasts are just so FANTASICALLY BIG they do defy belief.

Even now, after all these years, I still can't believe that breasts that GIGANTIC actually exist outside of my imagination, and that out there somewhere there is a woman walking around actually built like that.

Which makes it even more sad knowing that, when the time comes (and has we all know, ladies and gentlemen, it WILL happen one day) I can't help but feel that a cornerstone of the big bust industry will be gone too.

And not only that, but with the ban on string implants, with the possible exception of Beshine, I can't help but feel that we will probably never see a model of her size and statue again.

Obviously she's not going to disappear into thin air, and whatever happens I support her in whatever she decides to do-at the end of the day, it's her body and her life, and like everyone else she's free to do what she wants with it.

But giving her somewhat unique status of her 72" 60lb breasts has being the biggest in world, once she does eventually retire I feel that we probably wont see another quite like her again somehow.

[Bonecracker]

As long as men are interested in women, they will love breasts and so do a lot of women too!
As long as we love breasts, there will be great interest in the extreme of what is possible
As long as there is interest in extremes, there will be those who will rise to that challenge
And create new ways to reach new extremes and defy the past.

Remember when they banned silicone implants and we thought we'd never see the likes of Busty Dusty, Sarena Lee, Tawny Peaks, Toppsy Curvy, Lulu Divine, Wendy Whoppers etc etc ever again? And then... along came PPP and suddenly there was Chelsea Charms. And then custom made saline expanders and suddenly there was Keisha Evans and then Beshine.

And now our minds are being blown by incredible naturals like the British Power Trio: Rachel Aldana, Leann Crow and Sarah Randall.

Just wait until someone gets PPP done in a non-controlled country. then watch and see what happens. And then just wait until fat transfer/grafting becomes really stable and we get models who get almost all their body fat transferred into their boobs and do it annually over and over, growing each time and going past what we thought was possible in the 'pseudo natural' world.

Chelsea is the pinnacle of everything we have known so far and has paved the way for everything to come.

Gratitude, Ms. 'Charms'.

[andrat2000]

I find it even more depressing that we even consider speculating about her age or retirement plans.
The first one shouldn't be done when speaking about a lady. The 2nd is totally up to her, what she does how and when! There is not more to say about - in my opinion.


Maybe we should start to work with the correct numbers. I've seen frequently used old numbers.
http://www.chelseacharms.com/newsfaq.html

O.K. Enough chit chat - tell us about your boobies - first your measurements?
Currently: 200ZZZ-23-34


How heavy are they?
Theyre approximately 35 pounds apiece, ...

[motorboatman]

I find it even more depressing that we even consider speculating about her age or retirement plans.
The first one shouldn't be done when speaking about a lady. The 2nd is totally up to her, what she does how and when! There is not more to say about - in my opinion.


Maybe we should start to work with the correct numbers. I've seen frequently used old numbers.
http://www.chelseacharms.com/newsfaq.html

O.K. Enough chit chat - tell us about your boobies - first your measurements?
Currently: 200ZZZ-23-34


How heavy are they?
Theyre approximately 35 pounds apiece, ...

Wow. Those numbers obviously haven't been updated in quite awhile, at least a year. She's bigger than that now. I didn't realize how old her FAQ page is! Some of the other stuff looks pretty dated too. Thanks for pointing that out. We'll have to ask her to update it.

[andrat2000]

Wow. Those numbers obviously haven't been updated in quite awhile, at least a year. She's bigger than that now. I didn't realize how old her FAQ page is! Some of the other stuff looks pretty dated too. Thanks for pointing that out. We'll have to ask her to update it.

Oh yes, this is an extremly good idea! We fans love that. Will you ask her?
[hr]
I definetly don't want to miss a growth spurt of 28cm overbust bustline like between 2012 Jan. 30st : https://web.archive.org/web/201201301250...wsfaq.html

and 2012 Mar. 2nd : https://web.archive.org/web/201203021839...wsfaq.html

[motorboatman]

Wow. Those numbers obviously haven't been updated in quite awhile, at least a year. She's bigger than that now. I didn't realize how old her FAQ page is! Some of the other stuff looks pretty dated too. Thanks for pointing that out. We'll have to ask her to update it.

Oh yes, this is an extremly good idea! We fans love that. Will you ask her?
[hr]
I definetly don't want to miss a growth spurt of 28cm overbust bustline like between 2012 Jan. 30st : https://web.archive.org/web/201201301250...wsfaq.html

and 2012 Mar. 2nd : https://web.archive.org/web/201203021839...wsfaq.html

Agreed. It's absolutely astonishing what she's able to do! Her rate of refilling is literally amazing! But maybe you can ask her.

[andrat2000]

Agreed. It's absolutely astonishing what she's able to do! Her rate of refilling is literally amazing! But maybe you can ask her.

I think the numbers don't need special explanations. They speak for themselves.

But maybe the numbers are not that old anyway, that are now in her FAQ's. A user "swift" on the old BEA reported at 2014 June, 11th she changed informations to what is now in the FAQ: 200 cm / 35 pounds / over 16,6k.
In that case it is astonishing that she could keep her size for over 2 years between 2012 March 2nd and 2014 June, 11th with 181cm, 31 pounds and over 15k (or at least to 2013 October, 12th because there she is still at 181cm / 31 pounds / over 15k: https://web.archive.org/web/201309270846...wsfaq.html ).

Anyway it was your idea asking, it would be a pleassure if you could ask her. I'm happy with the informations provided so far.

[motorboatman]

Agreed. It's absolutely astonishing what she's able to do! Her rate of refilling is literally amazing! But maybe you can ask her.

I think the numbers don't need special explanations. They speak for themselves.

But maybe the numbers are not that old anyway, that are now in her FAQ's. A user "swift" on the old BEA reported at 2014 June, 11th she changed informations to what is now in the FAQ: 200 cm / 35 pounds / over 16,6k.
In that case it is astonishing that she could keep her size for over 2 years between 2012 March 2nd and 2014 June, 11th with 181cm, 31 pounds and over 15k (or at least to 2013 October, 12th because there she is still at 181cm / 31 pounds / over 15k: https://web.archive.org/web/201309270846...wsfaq.html ).

Anyway it was your idea asking, it would be a pleassure if you could ask her. I'm happy with the informations provided so far.

Actually, it turns out the FAQ numbers are pretty old, based on a newsletter from earlier this year when she discussed reaching 16K late LAST year (2013). Guess she didn't update it everywhere on her site right away. Probably too busy with that crazy travel schedule. I figured you would know this as a member.

[andrat2000]

Oh, I have the newsletter pictures saved. I didn't save the text. And I'm no member of the vault - I never was.
And I said "not that old anyway", especially as it seems it was fresh not that long ago when I can trust the report of that user - I don't read the FAQ every day.
Since I can't link to members content of the newsletter - neither on the regular homepage nor to the additional required membership of the vault for newsletter older the last three, the only source I can use public is the FAQ. And since everything about Chelsea Charms is well documented this is what the majority of the innternet users can use as informations.

But maybe you can ask Cubeman to help out here, mustn't be necessarily Chelsea Charms doing the update of the FAQ's.

[motorboatman]

Oh, I have the newsletter pictures saved. I didn't save the text. And I'm no member of the vault - I never was.
And I said "not that old anyway", especially as it seems it got updated not that long ago when I can trust the report of that user - I don't read the FAQ every day.
Since I can't link to members content of the newsletter - neither on the regular homepage nor to the additional required membership of the vault for newsletter older the last three, the only source I can use public is the FAQ. And since everything about Chelsea Charms is well documented this is what the majority of the users can use as informations.

But maybe you can ask Cubeman to help out here, mustn't be necessarily Chelsea Charms doing the update of the FAQ's.

Yeah, it looks like her news stuff is the most up to date by her and the FAQ lags way behind it but even her news is a few months behind.