03-20-2016, 12:58 PM
(03-20-2016, 10:10 AM)GeorgeGatley Wrote:George I cogently concur. Let me add concerning her legs, I last saw her live in Jersey this past Halloween weekend. Half way through her show, to my utter surprise, she ripped off her pants outfit. Her legs looked OUTSTANDING, both shapely & toned.(02-18-2014, 10:27 AM)Bonecracker Wrote: Every single CC fan since 2002 has wanted a "Changing Chelsea 2" or 3 or 4 or 6 by now... she is aware of this and our collective voice in requesting such has been ignored. Is this tactful disregard or ignorance? It's hard to say.
She may be of the mindset or received advice to the same that releasing another Changing Chelsea video will detract from her live show appeal. Sort of like what Metallica did in not releasing music videos until "One" which was a counter-productive move and merely served to limit their appeal. I'm not suggesting CC could enjoy the widespread acceptance and popularity/celebrity of Metaliica or other rock bands, but it can be argued she is limiting her appeal in not releasing a CC2,3,4... as well.
We've also got to be cognizant of the fact that she's approaching 40, and women don't have the smooth flawless bodies they had when they were in their early 20s. To which, you and I say, "So what, Chelsea, we still think you're the sexiest thing in creation." But we are talking about a woman's self-image here and not wishing to expose her every flaw and preserve it in video when it comes to full nudity in a video. This is probably why she will still do near full nudity live but not in a video. When was the last time you even saw her legs? She's been "panted" in videos and pictures since 2003.
And that's a shame, because she has a lovely bottom and gorgeous legs.
But this is her choice... we can only continue to ask and offer to compensate her for any new video she produces by buying it.
"Chelsea at home" doesn't exactly carry with it the same enticement and titillation that "Changing Chelsea" does!
OPINIONS MAY VARY! This is only mine.
On Chelsea aging:
Speaking personally:
1) Once a girl is 'minted' as gorgeous, then that's it. It does not matter how old she gets. How much her skin changes. Or even how fat. She's stuck with 'gorgeous'.
2) Personally, I find the way Chelsea's skin is changing really horny. I want to see as much of her now as they day she first appeared. And that will be forever.
I pray she never retires.
For other examples:
One of the 1960s models, she was German-American, did a 'come-back' set about twenty years later. She was just as gorgeous as she ever was, in my opinion. Her name is on the tip of my tongue.
Then there was Diane Poppos, who did a come-back set. By ordinary standards she was not in great condition but since she was minted as a gorgeous big-boob model, she was just as gorgeous to see.
I find the changes in a woman's body as she gets old really horny.
Please, Chelsea, never never never stop being Chelsea. Never.
--Needs to PM Motorboatman