02-18-2014, 10:27 AM
Every single CC fan since 2002 has wanted a "Changing Chelsea 2" or 3 or 4 or 6 by now... she is aware of this and our collective voice in requesting such has been ignored. Is this tactful disregard or ignorance? It's hard to say.
She may be of the mindset or received advice to the same that releasing another Changing Chelsea video will detract from her live show appeal. Sort of like what Metallica did in not releasing music videos until "One" which was a counter-productive move and merely served to limit their appeal. I'm not suggesting CC could enjoy the widespread acceptance and popularity/celebrity of Metaliica or other rock bands, but it can be argued she is limiting her appeal in not releasing a CC2,3,4... as well.
We've also got to be cognizant of the fact that she's approaching 40, and women don't have the smooth flawless bodies they had when they were in their early 20s. To which, you and I say, "So what, Chelsea, we still think you're the sexiest thing in creation." But we are talking about a woman's self-image here and not wishing to expose her every flaw and preserve it in video when it comes to full nudity in a video. This is probably why she will still do near full nudity live but not in a video. When was the last time you even saw her legs? She's been "panted" in videos and pictures since 2003.
And that's a shame, because she has a lovely bottom and gorgeous legs.
But this is her choice... we can only continue to ask and offer to compensate her for any new video she produces by buying it.
"Chelsea at home" doesn't exactly carry with it the same enticement and titillation that "Changing Chelsea" does!
OPINIONS MAY VARY! This is only mine.
She may be of the mindset or received advice to the same that releasing another Changing Chelsea video will detract from her live show appeal. Sort of like what Metallica did in not releasing music videos until "One" which was a counter-productive move and merely served to limit their appeal. I'm not suggesting CC could enjoy the widespread acceptance and popularity/celebrity of Metaliica or other rock bands, but it can be argued she is limiting her appeal in not releasing a CC2,3,4... as well.
We've also got to be cognizant of the fact that she's approaching 40, and women don't have the smooth flawless bodies they had when they were in their early 20s. To which, you and I say, "So what, Chelsea, we still think you're the sexiest thing in creation." But we are talking about a woman's self-image here and not wishing to expose her every flaw and preserve it in video when it comes to full nudity in a video. This is probably why she will still do near full nudity live but not in a video. When was the last time you even saw her legs? She's been "panted" in videos and pictures since 2003.
And that's a shame, because she has a lovely bottom and gorgeous legs.
But this is her choice... we can only continue to ask and offer to compensate her for any new video she produces by buying it.
"Chelsea at home" doesn't exactly carry with it the same enticement and titillation that "Changing Chelsea" does!
OPINIONS MAY VARY! This is only mine.
Check out my new story!Â
[url=http://forum.bearchive.co/thread-270-post-20860.html#pid20860]http://forum.bearchive.co/thread-270-post-20860.html#pid20860[/url]Â
[url=http://forum.bearchive.co/thread-270-post-20860.html#pid20860]http://forum.bearchive.co/thread-270-post-20860.html#pid20860[/url]Â