06-16-2014, 11:18 AM
(06-16-2014, 05:18 AM)lolchair Wrote: Beshine vs chelsea at her biggest
My observations:
In the image their bust has the same width and projection
The underside of their breast is at the same level/height
The top of beshine's bust is close to shoulder height.
The top of Chelsea's bust is around 20% lower.
Other factors to take into account
Chelsea Charms is a smaller person
My conclusion:
Chelsea charms is a smaller person then beshine. This means that beshine needs more volume to look the same size as Chelsea.
In the picture Beshin's bust looks a lot fuller then Chelsea's. This is visible when comparing the top of their breast.
Taking into account these 2 factors i can conclude beshine has a lot more volume then Chelsea.
This means 2 things:
-Chelsea Charms is smaller then she estimates
-Beshine is larger then we estimated so far
Lol, it's been clear for awhile that you're a huge fan of Beshine, so I take this into account when reading your assessment. I guess it's all about interpretation. Clearly Beshine has her implants much higher, but that by no means makes her bigger. It just means their higher on her chest which projects them more, that's all. Unfortunately as with the previous photo, the left side is zoomed in slightly more so those factors take out the width and projection argument. Because we're not looking at the same depth on the photos. As in a majority of the photos I've seen Chelsea clearly hangs lower almost to her privates which means they're clearly not at the same level and height. I agree Beshine is taller, but not by much, so needing more volume is slight at best. However it should also be considered, Beshine is MUCH skinnier, meaning Chelsea, who is clearly much thicker (don't take that the wrong way Chelsea fans) has to be much bigger to project the same width. So it's Chelsea that actually would need more volume. Imagine hanging 2 watermelons from a sapling and then hanging the same watermelons from a full grown redwood tree. They'd look a lot bigger on the sapling, right? Kind of like a fat guy, skinny guy weiner debate. The same size looks bigger/longer on the skinny guy.
And Beshine looks fuller at the top because her implants are only 3 years old. Let's see, Chelsea is carrying hers for how long now? 15 years or so? Let's see how high they are on Beshine in 15 years. Gravity is tough on everybody. Plentyuptopp had the same thing with the 'high' chested boobs. And, although smaller than Beshine, she loved doing photos of just her boobs from a lower angle which made her appear much bigger in photos than in person. I know this because I saw her in person. Couldn't believe the difference! I call it the angle/zoom effect. You wouldn't believe how much difference it makes!
This means 2 things:
Beshine is smaller than she appears.
Chelsea is bigger than she appears.
The only thing we REALLY know is that on certain dates of the year, Chelsea is smaller than Beshine due to her drains that are well-documented and witnessed by several fans which Beshine fans love hearing. But we also know there are times Chelsea lets herself grow and grow and goes all in to set a new standard for cc volume. This is also well-documented and witnessed, which Beshine fans hate hearing.
I'm exhausted, but a fun topic for sure. This forum is COOL.