06-17-2014, 10:14 AM
(06-17-2014, 05:10 AM)lolchair Wrote:(06-16-2014, 11:18 AM)motorboatman Wrote:(06-16-2014, 05:18 AM)lolchair Wrote: Beshine vs chelsea at her biggest
My observations:
In the image their bust has the same width and projection
The underside of their breast is at the same level/height
The top of beshine's bust is close to shoulder height.
The top of Chelsea's bust is around 20% lower.
Other factors to take into account
Chelsea Charms is a smaller person
My conclusion:
Chelsea charms is a smaller person then beshine. This means that beshine needs more volume to look the same size as Chelsea.
In the picture Beshin's bust looks a lot fuller then Chelsea's. This is visible when comparing the top of their breast.
Taking into account these 2 factors i can conclude beshine has a lot more volume then Chelsea.
This means 2 things:
-Chelsea Charms is smaller then she estimates
-Beshine is larger then we estimated so far
Lol, it's been clear for awhile that you're a huge fan of Beshine, so I take this into account when reading your assessment. I guess it's all about interpretation. Clearly Beshine has her implants much higher, but that by no means makes her bigger. It just means their higher on her chest which projects them more, that's all. Unfortunately as with the previous photo, the left side is zoomed in slightly more so those factors take out the width and projection argument. Because we're not looking at the same depth on the photos. As in a majority of the photos I've seen Chelsea clearly hangs lower almost to her privates which means they're clearly not at the same level and height. I agree Beshine is taller, but not by much, so needing more volume is slight at best. However it should also be considered, Beshine is MUCH skinnier, meaning Chelsea, who is clearly much thicker (don't take that the wrong way Chelsea fans) has to be much bigger to project the same width. So it's Chelsea that actually would need more volume. Imagine hanging 2 watermelons from a sapling and then hanging the same watermelons from a full grown redwood tree. They'd look a lot bigger on the sapling, right? Kind of like a fat guy, skinny guy weiner debate. The same size looks bigger/longer on the skinny guy.
And Beshine looks fuller at the top because her implants are only 3 years old. Let's see, Chelsea is carrying hers for how long now? 15 years or so? Let's see how high they are on Beshine in 15 years. Gravity is tough on everybody. Plentyuptopp had the same thing with the 'high' chested boobs. And, although smaller than Beshine, she loved doing photos of just her boobs from a lower angle which made her appear much bigger in photos than in person. I know this because I saw her in person. Couldn't believe the difference! I call it the angle/zoom effect. You wouldn't believe how much difference it makes!
This means 2 things:
Beshine is smaller than she appears.
Chelsea is bigger than she appears.
The only thing we REALLY know is that on certain dates of the year, Chelsea is smaller than Beshine due to her drains that are well-documented and witnessed by several fans which Beshine fans love hearing. But we also know there are times Chelsea lets herself grow and grow and goes all in to set a new standard for cc volume. This is also well-documented and witnessed, which Beshine fans hate hearing.
I'm exhausted, but a fun topic for sure. This forum is COOL.
Its great we can discuss this in a positive way. Like agent dee said i think its amazing we even need to discuss this. Both women are huge and amazing.
To be honest i try to be as objective as possible. The Reason i create these comparison pics is to make comparison possible and somewhat more reliable.
Chelsea might be around the same size at her biggest. THe thing is, she only is her biggest a few weeks per year. I guess this is what bothers beshine fans, Beshine is larger most of the year.
Thanks for giving arguments why you think Chelsea is larger. I hope we can keep this a positive discussion. Its great to have such in dept conversation about both women.
In the end I have to say i am still convinced that beshine looks a lot bigger in her recent pics. I will post them to show what i mean.
'In the end' I'm still convinced that Chelsea is larger mainly because her history is much more documented and public nearly every step of the way while Beshine is much more private and reclusive.
I can tell by your statements that for some reason it bothers you to high heaven that Chelsea drains once in awhile. This is completely irrelevant in to who is bigger. If Chelsea stayed home all the time, she, based on her comments, wouldn't have to drain. That likely wouldn't appease Beshine fans, I'm guessing. And I'm not sure we're 100 percent sure that Beshine never drains. Keep in mind that she has disappeared from time to time. Whose to say for sure, she didn't lighten her load once in awhile for traveling purposes? I don't like drains. I'm not sure who does. Beshine knows this and would never admit to it. Chelsea is extremely open about her boob day to day "good and bad." As much as I hate drains, it's probably what has kept her in the show for what 15 years? So I guess it's a necessary evil.
But again it's well documented all over the internet by fans that have met Chelsea that when she's at her biggest that you simply can't understand how gigantic she really is.
Unfortunately comparison photos are highly unreliable because it doesn't take into account the simple fact that we don't know if Chelsea's photos are when she was at her biggest or she just had a drain or is recovering from one. Not to mention the fact that they're done by different cameras and never seem to be at the same depth. So any scientist will tell you then the experiment fails.
I agree with Dee as well. But Beshine fans are a determined cult following that's for sure. It's like they're chasing something and will go to any length or speculation to make it true to convince themselves.
While Chelsea fans simply appear at least on the internet, to roll with the punches. Maybe because she's been on 'top' for so long. I'm not really sure.
I love them both and I wish there were three, four or five more of them. Then we could really discuss.
It's absolutely fun stuff. And joyful discussions for sure.