11-26-2013, 06:23 AM
If you've seen Chelsea in person lately, you know that she IS that fuckin' BIG. It's the rare photo that captures how massive this lovely lady is in reality. I can't explain why the camera lens rarely does her justice. I've also noticed that almost every photo of her from the last few years makes her midsection look large to the point of looking like she has a fat stomach yet, in person, she's as trim as she was ten years ago...go figure.
Fat, skinny, BIG or not-so-big, I adore her and anxiously await the next time I get to see her!
![[Image: 2013%20Black%20Halter%204.JPG?m=1384590412]](http://gallery.bearchive.co/var/resizes/The-Women-of-BEA/Chelsea-Charms/2013%20Black%20Halter%204.JPG?m=1384590412)
How come the camera adds ten pounds to her stomach but not to her tits?
Fat, skinny, BIG or not-so-big, I adore her and anxiously await the next time I get to see her!
How come the camera adds ten pounds to her stomach but not to her tits?
