Posts: 6,338
Threads: 191
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
31
Dear
Zoo Magazine;
We have vastly different ideas about what constitutes a DD cup and what also constitutes "bra busting big tits".
Numbers 33 and 36 are the only qualifiers.
41 Mega-boobed babes, me arse.
http://www.zootoday.com/girls/cover-girl...ng-gallery
Check out my new story!Â
[url=http://forum.bearchive.co/thread-270-post-20860.html#pid20860]http://forum.bearchive.co/thread-270-post-20860.html#pid20860[/url]Â
Posts: 1,033
Threads: 6
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
6
ah some are quite pretty, albeit not busty enough.
-
-
Skepticism is good, it is the reason why Science progresses. We don't live anymore in the era when a model said she had a 183PPP bra and that was considered a fact by the rest of the mortals.
Welcome to the internet, where men are men, women are men, and children are the FBI
If it hurts, it means that you're still living
Posts: 206
Threads: 10
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
1
02-11-2014, 06:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-11-2014, 06:19 PM by Archaon.)
Disclaimer - in my mind Nuts and Zoo are one and the same and effectively interchangeable. When I talk about one I may well mean the other, and vice versa.
I've not bothered to run through the gallery, but they have had some good models over the years between them.
Maria Swan/Jana Defi, Jordan Carver (one of the shots of her actually included a nipple and for that I forever bow to them), Rachel Aldana, Hannah Elizabeth, Sophie Reade etc.
I've also seen them feature models like September Carrino, Leanne Crow and Sarah Nicola Randall in features like '100 Mega Boobs', though not as full sets (that doesn't mean it's not happened, just that I've not seen them).
10-15 years ago magazines like this were featuring B and C cups on the cover whereas now you almost always see a girl in the DD-G range. Granted we're not talking truly huge boobs but nevertheless it's movement, albeit slow, in the right direction.
