Beshine

[Bonecracker]

Calm it down, please. This isn't the playground.

[andrat2000]

The good thing, I can wait. And time will tell.
[hr]
And by the way someone posted elsewhere (most people know what I mean) a screenshot. Sometimes these are taken down again. That's why I'm not going fetch it from there and post it here.

[nitschke66]

Calm it down, please. This isn't the playground.

Bonecracker, I wholeheartedly concur with your peace making efforts.
Now for my insight & perspective on this Beshine issue. First, let me officially state that I've been a CHELSEA FANATIC for 14-15 yrs. & personally adore EVERYTHING concerning her. I appreciate the shear magnitude of both these beautiful young ladies breasts & their commitment for continuously pleasing millions of followers. I've ALWAYS contended that Chelsea was the larger of the two. However, after viewing an 18 second clip titled "Beshine - Strip Sofa - Bigger - xhamster... " I just don't know anymore. Beshine is IMMENSE in this clip & now might possibly be the larger of the two.

[Kopykat]

Beshine Strip Sofa is video morph.

[nitschke66]

Beshine Strip Sofa is video morph.

Are you positive it's a morph ? How is a video morphed ? It looked so authentic.

[Articdonkey]

Beshine Strip Sofa is video morph.

Are you positive it's a morph ? How is a video morphed ? It looked so authentic.

It definitely is a morph, albeit well done. Look around her right breast you will see a fuzziness which denotes it has been doctored.

[Kopykat]

Beshine Strip Sofa is video morph.

Are you positive it's a morph ? How is a video morphed ? It looked so authentic.

A video is just a series of photographs called frames. There are photo manipulation programs that you can use to edit those frames individually. The cleavage is off, skin is skating about like it's under a magnifying glass, fingers and arms are bending in ways they shouldn't. 110% positive.

[motorboatman]

Beshine Strip Sofa is video morph.

Are you positive it's a morph ? How is a video morphed ? It looked so authentic.

A video is just a series of photographs called frames. There are photo manipulation programs that you can use to edit those frames individually. The cleavage is off, skin is skating about like it's under a magnifying glass, fingers and arms are bending in ways they shouldn't. 110% positive.

I'm seeing more and more of this on the internet. Makes me wonder sometimes if what I'm seeing is real or not! Imagine where we'll be in 10 or 20 years. The girls won't have to get implants at all, they can morph their videos. Perfect!

[Kopykat]

Are you positive it's a morph ? How is a video morphed ? It looked so authentic.

A video is just a series of photographs called frames. There are photo manipulation programs that you can use to edit those frames individually. The cleavage is off, skin is skating about like it's under a magnifying glass, fingers and arms are bending in ways they shouldn't. 110% positive.

I'm seeing more and more of this on the internet. Makes me wonder sometimes if what I'm seeing is real or not! Imagine where we'll be in 10 or 20 years. The girls won't have to get implants at all, they can morph their videos. Perfect!

Shhhhh dude! Heh-heh, pay no attention to motorboat over here. But to be honest, I think some girls get implants because they want their breasts to look like they do when they're in a bra, but out of a bra. We can morph videos but there would be that group of women who'd want their breasts to look like they do in the video, off the record.

[Agent Dee]

plus to add that 'video' was from one of her Score magazine vids and she was under 10K at the time so yeah it has been altered, here is a gif of her from one of those videos un altered so you can see the difference.



AD

[motorboatman]

This might interest you

It's a bummer the photo on the right is zoomed in more than the one on the left. It's hard to tell if she's bigger or just closer, but it's probably fair to say she's gone from 10K to 11K over the last three years. I didn't realize how much face work she had done either, but I think I like the new face a little better. Certainly her booty is bigger, just wish I could see the whole thing in the flesh at some point. She's been very secretive about it, but it's clear it's a bigger booty. She appears more well curvy everywhere which I like too rather than the skinnier 2011 look.

[Kopykat]

Beshine vs chelsea at her biggest

My observations:
In the image their bust has the same width and projection
The underside of their breast is at the same level/height
The top of beshine's bust is close to shoulder height.
The top of Chelsea's bust is around 20% lower.

Other factors to take into account
Chelsea Charms is a smaller person

My conclusion:
Chelsea charms is a smaller person then beshine. This means that beshine needs more volume to look the same size as Chelsea.
In the picture Beshin's bust looks a lot fuller then Chelsea's. This is visible when comparing the top of their breast.

Taking into account these 2 factors i can conclude beshine has a lot more volume then Chelsea.

This means 2 things:
-Chelsea Charms is smaller then she estimates
-Beshine is larger then we estimated so far

To me, Chels is more compacted into a sphere, while Beshine is more oval and at an angle at least from the front. Beshine's breasts are close together at the top which makes them look hella big when she takes top half of her body shots but the lower half of them are further apart.

[motorboatman]

Beshine vs chelsea at her biggest

My observations:
In the image their bust has the same width and projection
The underside of their breast is at the same level/height
The top of beshine's bust is close to shoulder height.
The top of Chelsea's bust is around 20% lower.

Other factors to take into account
Chelsea Charms is a smaller person

My conclusion:
Chelsea charms is a smaller person then beshine. This means that beshine needs more volume to look the same size as Chelsea.
In the picture Beshin's bust looks a lot fuller then Chelsea's. This is visible when comparing the top of their breast.

Taking into account these 2 factors i can conclude beshine has a lot more volume then Chelsea.

This means 2 things:
-Chelsea Charms is smaller then she estimates
-Beshine is larger then we estimated so far

Lol, it's been clear for awhile that you're a huge fan of Beshine, so I take this into account when reading your assessment. I guess it's all about interpretation. Clearly Beshine has her implants much higher, but that by no means makes her bigger. It just means their higher on her chest which projects them more, that's all. Unfortunately as with the previous photo, the left side is zoomed in slightly more so those factors take out the width and projection argument. Because we're not looking at the same depth on the photos. As in a majority of the photos I've seen Chelsea clearly hangs lower almost to her privates which means they're clearly not at the same level and height. I agree Beshine is taller, but not by much, so needing more volume is slight at best. However it should also be considered, Beshine is MUCH skinnier, meaning Chelsea, who is clearly much thicker (don't take that the wrong way Chelsea fans) has to be much bigger to project the same width. So it's Chelsea that actually would need more volume. Imagine hanging 2 watermelons from a sapling and then hanging the same watermelons from a full grown redwood tree. They'd look a lot bigger on the sapling, right? Kind of like a fat guy, skinny guy weiner debate. The same size looks bigger/longer on the skinny guy.

And Beshine looks fuller at the top because her implants are only 3 years old. Let's see, Chelsea is carrying hers for how long now? 15 years or so? Let's see how high they are on Beshine in 15 years. Gravity is tough on everybody. Plentyuptopp had the same thing with the 'high' chested boobs. And, although smaller than Beshine, she loved doing photos of just her boobs from a lower angle which made her appear much bigger in photos than in person. I know this because I saw her in person. Couldn't believe the difference! I call it the angle/zoom effect. You wouldn't believe how much difference it makes!

This means 2 things:

Beshine is smaller than she appears.
Chelsea is bigger than she appears.

The only thing we REALLY know is that on certain dates of the year, Chelsea is smaller than Beshine due to her drains that are well-documented and witnessed by several fans which Beshine fans love hearing. But we also know there are times Chelsea lets herself grow and grow and goes all in to set a new standard for cc volume. This is also well-documented and witnessed, which Beshine fans hate hearing.

I'm exhausted, but a fun topic for sure. This forum is COOL.

[Agent Dee]

what really matters in the end is we have two equally super humongously busty women in this world trying to out boob each other and I am 100% all for that!

AD

[Bonecracker]

We need a third runner in this race.

[motorboatman]

Beshine vs chelsea at her biggest

My observations:
In the image their bust has the same width and projection
The underside of their breast is at the same level/height
The top of beshine's bust is close to shoulder height.
The top of Chelsea's bust is around 20% lower.

Other factors to take into account
Chelsea Charms is a smaller person

My conclusion:
Chelsea charms is a smaller person then beshine. This means that beshine needs more volume to look the same size as Chelsea.
In the picture Beshin's bust looks a lot fuller then Chelsea's. This is visible when comparing the top of their breast.

Taking into account these 2 factors i can conclude beshine has a lot more volume then Chelsea.

This means 2 things:
-Chelsea Charms is smaller then she estimates
-Beshine is larger then we estimated so far

Lol, it's been clear for awhile that you're a huge fan of Beshine, so I take this into account when reading your assessment. I guess it's all about interpretation. Clearly Beshine has her implants much higher, but that by no means makes her bigger. It just means their higher on her chest which projects them more, that's all. Unfortunately as with the previous photo, the left side is zoomed in slightly more so those factors take out the width and projection argument. Because we're not looking at the same depth on the photos. As in a majority of the photos I've seen Chelsea clearly hangs lower almost to her privates which means they're clearly not at the same level and height. I agree Beshine is taller, but not by much, so needing more volume is slight at best. However it should also be considered, Beshine is MUCH skinnier, meaning Chelsea, who is clearly much thicker (don't take that the wrong way Chelsea fans) has to be much bigger to project the same width. So it's Chelsea that actually would need more volume. Imagine hanging 2 watermelons from a sapling and then hanging the same watermelons from a full grown redwood tree. They'd look a lot bigger on the sapling, right? Kind of like a fat guy, skinny guy weiner debate. The same size looks bigger/longer on the skinny guy.

And Beshine looks fuller at the top because her implants are only 3 years old. Let's see, Chelsea is carrying hers for how long now? 15 years or so? Let's see how high they are on Beshine in 15 years. Gravity is tough on everybody. Plentyuptopp had the same thing with the 'high' chested boobs. And, although smaller than Beshine, she loved doing photos of just her boobs from a lower angle which made her appear much bigger in photos than in person. I know this because I saw her in person. Couldn't believe the difference! I call it the angle/zoom effect. You wouldn't believe how much difference it makes!

This means 2 things:

Beshine is smaller than she appears.
Chelsea is bigger than she appears.

The only thing we REALLY know is that on certain dates of the year, Chelsea is smaller than Beshine due to her drains that are well-documented and witnessed by several fans which Beshine fans love hearing. But we also know there are times Chelsea lets herself grow and grow and goes all in to set a new standard for cc volume. This is also well-documented and witnessed, which Beshine fans hate hearing.

I'm exhausted, but a fun topic for sure. This forum is COOL.

Its great we can discuss this in a positive way. Like agent dee said i think its amazing we even need to discuss this. Both women are huge and amazing.

To be honest i try to be as objective as possible. The Reason i create these comparison pics is to make comparison possible and somewhat more reliable.

Chelsea might be around the same size at her biggest. THe thing is, she only is her biggest a few weeks per year. I guess this is what bothers beshine fans, Beshine is larger most of the year.

Thanks for giving arguments why you think Chelsea is larger. I hope we can keep this a positive discussion. Its great to have such in dept conversation about both women.
In the end I have to say i am still convinced that beshine looks a lot bigger in her recent pics. I will post them to show what i mean.

'In the end' I'm still convinced that Chelsea is larger mainly because her history is much more documented and public nearly every step of the way while Beshine is much more private and reclusive.

I can tell by your statements that for some reason it bothers you to high heaven that Chelsea drains once in awhile. This is completely irrelevant in to who is bigger. If Chelsea stayed home all the time, she, based on her comments, wouldn't have to drain. That likely wouldn't appease Beshine fans, I'm guessing. And I'm not sure we're 100 percent sure that Beshine never drains. Keep in mind that she has disappeared from time to time. Whose to say for sure, she didn't lighten her load once in awhile for traveling purposes? I don't like drains. I'm not sure who does. Beshine knows this and would never admit to it. Chelsea is extremely open about her boob day to day "good and bad." As much as I hate drains, it's probably what has kept her in the show for what 15 years? So I guess it's a necessary evil.

But again it's well documented all over the internet by fans that have met Chelsea that when she's at her biggest that you simply can't understand how gigantic she really is.

Unfortunately comparison photos are highly unreliable because it doesn't take into account the simple fact that we don't know if Chelsea's photos are when she was at her biggest or she just had a drain or is recovering from one. Not to mention the fact that they're done by different cameras and never seem to be at the same depth. So any scientist will tell you then the experiment fails.

I agree with Dee as well. But Beshine fans are a determined cult following that's for sure. It's like they're chasing something and will go to any length or speculation to make it true to convince themselves.

While Chelsea fans simply appear at least on the internet, to roll with the punches. Maybe because she's been on 'top' for so long. I'm not really sure.

I love them both and I wish there were three, four or five more of them. Then we could really discuss.

It's absolutely fun stuff. And joyful discussions for sure.

[Bonecracker]

Yeah... but Beshine has more saline! LOL

[motorboatman]

Yeah... but Beshine has more saline! LOL

Great call Bonecracker!!!

Beshine has more saline.

Chelsea has more string.

These two things we are sure of beyond a reasonable doubt.

[addy2000]

Beshine also has that cute German accent going for her

[Bonecracker]

Beshine also has that cute German accent going for her

I'll bet you say that to all the super-sized booby queens from Minnesota! LOL

[addy2000]

Haha, they have that cute Minnesotan accent going for them ;P

[Bonecracker]

Haha, they have that cute Minnesotan accent going for them ;P

Oh yah, eh? Sounds like a Canadian with a mouthful of cotton balls.

[addy2000]

Haha I think in the end I could forgive a woman with basketball sized tits any old horrible dialect ;P

[Agent Dee]

I have to agree with my good friend addy *high fives* BUT if she sounded like Fran from The Nanny she would have to have boobs at least beachball size or bigger tho .

AD

[Kopykat]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=PJv4p8voUwo