(03-19-2016, 05:42 PM)Agent Dee Wrote: He has my vote

AD

(03-19-2016, 05:47 PM)motorboatman Wrote:

(03-19-2016, 05:42 PM)Agent Dee Wrote: He has my vote

AD

Bone's first 100 days in office would include free boob jobs for all women, possibly?

(02-18-2014, 04:23 PM)Kopykat Wrote: Other countries, I'd say are more excepting of the naked female form. Lolo had no qualms about bringing them out for TV as well as a few other dancers on other shows. Other places seem to have embraced what adults already know while we act like "it can't get me if its covered".

(02-18-2014, 10:27 AM)Bonecracker Wrote: Every single CC fan since 2002 has wanted a "Changing Chelsea 2" or 3 or 4 or 6 by now... she is aware of this and our collective voice in requesting such has been ignored. Is this tactful disregard or ignorance? It's hard to say.

She may be of the mindset or received advice to the same that releasing another Changing Chelsea video will detract from her live show appeal. Sort of like what Metallica did in not releasing music videos until "One" which was a counter-productive move and merely served to limit their appeal. I'm not suggesting CC could enjoy the widespread acceptance and popularity/celebrity of Metaliica or other rock bands, but it can be argued she is limiting her appeal in not releasing a CC2,3,4... as well.

We've also got to be cognizant of the fact that she's approaching 40, and women don't have the smooth flawless bodies they had when they were in their early 20s. To which, you and I say, "So what, Chelsea, we still think you're the sexiest thing in creation." But we are talking about a woman's self-image here and not wishing to expose her every flaw and preserve it in video when it comes to full nudity in a video. This is probably why she will still do near full nudity live but not in a video. When was the last time you even saw her legs? She's been "panted" in videos and pictures since 2003.

And that's a shame, because she has a lovely bottom and gorgeous legs.

But this is her choice... we can only continue to ask and offer to compensate her for any new video she produces by buying it.
"Chelsea at home" doesn't exactly carry with it the same enticement and titillation that "Changing Chelsea" does!

OPINIONS MAY VARY! This is only mine.

(03-20-2016, 10:10 AM)GeorgeGatley Wrote:

(02-18-2014, 10:27 AM)Bonecracker Wrote: Every single CC fan since 2002 has wanted a "Changing Chelsea 2" or 3 or 4 or 6 by now... she is aware of this and our collective voice in requesting such has been ignored. Is this tactful disregard or ignorance? It's hard to say.

She may be of the mindset or received advice to the same that releasing another Changing Chelsea video will detract from her live show appeal. Sort of like what Metallica did in not releasing music videos until "One" which was a counter-productive move and merely served to limit their appeal. I'm not suggesting CC could enjoy the widespread acceptance and popularity/celebrity of Metaliica or other rock bands, but it can be argued she is limiting her appeal in not releasing a CC2,3,4... as well.

We've also got to be cognizant of the fact that she's approaching 40, and women don't have the smooth flawless bodies they had when they were in their early 20s. To which, you and I say, "So what, Chelsea, we still think you're the sexiest thing in creation." But we are talking about a woman's self-image here and not wishing to expose her every flaw and preserve it in video when it comes to full nudity in a video. This is probably why she will still do near full nudity live but not in a video. When was the last time you even saw her legs? She's been "panted" in videos and pictures since 2003.

And that's a shame, because she has a lovely bottom and gorgeous legs.

But this is her choice... we can only continue to ask and offer to compensate her for any new video she produces by buying it.
"Chelsea at home" doesn't exactly carry with it the same enticement and titillation that "Changing Chelsea" does!

OPINIONS MAY VARY! This is only mine.

On Chelsea aging:

Speaking personally:

1) Once a girl is 'minted' as gorgeous, then that's it. It does not matter how old she gets. How much her skin changes. Or even how fat. She's stuck with 'gorgeous'.

2) Personally, I find the way Chelsea's skin is changing really horny. I want to see as much of her now as they day she first appeared. And that will be forever.

I pray she never retires.

For other examples:

One of the 1960s models, she was German-American, did a 'come-back' set about twenty years later. She was just as gorgeous as she ever was, in my opinion. Her name is on the tip of my tongue.

Then there was Diane Poppos, who did a come-back set. By ordinary standards she was not in great condition but since she was minted as a gorgeous big-boob model, she was just as gorgeous to see.

I find the changes in a woman's body as she gets old really horny.

Please, Chelsea, never never never stop being Chelsea. Never.

(03-20-2016, 12:58 PM)nitschke66 Wrote: George I cogently concur. Let me add concerning her legs, I last saw her live in Jersey this past Halloween weekend. Half way through her show, to my utter surprise, she ripped off her pants outfit. Her legs looked OUTSTANDING, both shapely & toned.

(04-02-2014, 03:58 AM)titzling319 Wrote: I searched through my photo sets (over 500 of 'em) and could only find three where Chelsea was wearing a corset...the set featuring the pink corset that ManofKent posted above (from 2001) and these two from 1999:

[hr]
Another view:

Why no corsets in 13 years, or so?

(03-20-2016, 02:10 PM)GeorgeGatley Wrote:

(04-02-2014, 03:58 AM)titzling319 Wrote: I searched through my photo sets (over 500 of 'em) and could only find three where Chelsea was wearing a corset...the set featuring the pink corset that ManofKent posted above (from 2001) and these two from 1999:

[hr]
Another view:

Why no corsets in 13 years, or so?

I wish she would do that Score corset set she did in 1999, exact same lingerie, now that she is really huge, just for comparison, same poses. Oh Heaven ...

(03-19-2016, 04:58 PM)GeorgeGatley Wrote:

(07-16-2013, 01:49 PM)titzling319 Wrote: Here are a few samples from Chelsea's latest postings. I know, kind of slim pickin's but, Hey! It's Chelsea!

It would be great to see photographs of Chelsea after her drain, when her breasts must be flaccid and wrinkly, now that thy are only 2/3 the size. I wonder how long it takes for the skin to re-tighten.

(03-24-2016, 10:36 AM)Lordofall96 Wrote:

(03-19-2016, 04:58 PM)GeorgeGatley Wrote:

(07-16-2013, 01:49 PM)titzling319 Wrote: Here are a few samples from Chelsea's latest postings. I know, kind of slim pickin's but, Hey! It's Chelsea!

It would be great to see photographs of Chelsea after her drain, when her breasts must be flaccid and wrinkly, now that thy are only 2/3 the size. I wonder how long it takes for the skin to re-tighten.

Now this I would love to see.

(04-01-2016, 08:39 PM)Mr. Fixit Wrote: Can we at least get a screenshot? I haven't seen it yet, no credit card so no access to her site.

(04-03-2016, 05:28 PM)loucar1986 Wrote: its been quite but the three models i follow the most (beshine leanne aldana) have been posting next to nothing. Chelseas stuff is so hard to find and samples seem to be a dirty word from her marketing standpoint.