The Breast Enhancement Archive

(02-20-2015, 01:12 PM)nitschke66 Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-20-2015, 12:50 PM)andrat2000 Wrote: [ -> ]She's such a great role model for fill-ups. When skin is relaxed and she likes she can get the next shoot.

Maybe I get an occassion this weekend to watch her on cam. Then I will try to find out.

I also recognized she had had removed displaying bugs on her website today caused by the new small 4k picture of her latest movie. In her member area this caused problems with displaying the movie overview previews. The lines and preview boxes got displaced. It was always format 4 minute(s) 33 second(s) now it just says 4:33 min.

Also the boob weight stats in the "About Me" section of the member area was never there. But it always was in the "About Me" of the public section. Not unusual to have two websites with the same domain on different servers under an a Apache > 2 webserver. Makes sense to have public and member section splitted.

So maybe they just did an update of the entire website customizing and html pages and in this occassion they updated the stats, too.

Just stating she increases her stats IMMEDIATELY after a Chelsea increase.

I noticed the same thing! This is actually the third time (that I know of) for sure that Beshine quickly adjusted her numbers after Chelsea. I remember one time it came within hours after Chelsea changed her own numbers. There's no doubt Beshine is obsessed with trying to keep up. Unfortunately she clearly reached her limit a while ago with the expanders because she hasn't shown a substantial increase in years and people are noticing on other forums so I put no faith in Beshine's new numbers. It's a simple advertising ploy, nothing more, again unfortunately. The best hope for Beshine is to get new expanders to allow for more expansion otherwise she won't ever catch Chelsea, if that's her ultimate goal.

One thing is for sure, that 4K video was the best I've seen quality wise. I don't know if anybody can match Beshine in that category.

(02-20-2015, 09:26 PM)motorboatman Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-20-2015, 01:12 PM)nitschke66 Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-20-2015, 12:50 PM)andrat2000 Wrote: [ -> ]She's such a great role model for fill-ups. When skin is relaxed and she likes she can get the next shoot.

Maybe I get an occassion this weekend to watch her on cam. Then I will try to find out.

I also recognized she had had removed displaying bugs on her website today caused by the new small 4k picture of her latest movie. In her member area this caused problems with displaying the movie overview previews. The lines and preview boxes got displaced. It was always format 4 minute(s) 33 second(s) now it just says 4:33 min.

Also the boob weight stats in the "About Me" section of the member area was never there. But it always was in the "About Me" of the public section. Not unusual to have two websites with the same domain on different servers under an a Apache > 2 webserver. Makes sense to have public and member section splitted.

So maybe they just did an update of the entire website customizing and html pages and in this occassion they updated the stats, too.

Just stating she increases her stats IMMEDIATELY after a Chelsea increase.

I noticed the same thing! This is actually the third time (that I know of) for sure that Beshine quickly adjusted her numbers after Chelsea. I remember one time it came within hours after Chelsea changed her own numbers. There's no doubt Beshine is obsessed with trying to keep up. Unfortunately she clearly reached her limit a while ago with the expanders because she hasn't shown a substantial increase in years and people are noticing on other forums so I put no faith in Beshine's new numbers. It's a simple advertising ploy, nothing more, again unfortunately. The best hope for Beshine is to get new expanders to allow for more expansion otherwise she won't ever catch Chelsea, if that's her ultimate goal.

One thing is for sure, that 4K video was the best I've seen quality wise. I don't know if anybody can match Beshine in that category.

Gotta love her for this obsession, because the more she obsesses; the more she pushes Chelsea into the outer limits. WE ALL DOUBLY BENEFIT. THANK YOU Beshine.

The majority of people on the other boards recognized that Beshine had had and still has a substantial growth over the years. Only few deny this. I recognized it's always the same peoples who deny the growth. So to each their own.

I should note that I'VE noticed the majority of people on all the boards recognized that Beshine HASN'T had substantial growth over the years. Only a few deny this. And I've also recognized it's always the same few people who insist they've grown. So to each their own.

Based on how her boobs have clearly settled and rounded and lowered and softened (she's even admitted this) over the last few years (check out her webcam), it's incredibly obvious she has backed off any major expansion either out of health concerns or personal choice. I give her credit because they look so much more natural now, even to guys like us.

I'm not on [u]all boards[/u], I can only speak about 4 boards (5 with deviant art) I'm a member off and where I posted in a Beshine thread - [u]always with the same user account[/u]. Easy to find in Google with search term: andrat2000 forum profile
Make sure you go to "search tools" and put "verbatim" before you search. Now while this is sorted out ...

A few things I can easily agree with:
- "rounded" OMG yes they have because this is usually the case when an initial flat saline expander implant get frequent fill-ups. For that reason they gradually became rounder and fuller from 8k (03/2010) to 10k (15/02/2011) to approx. >11k (08/2011) to >14k (Spring 2013) >16k (05 or 06/2014) to approx. 19k (02/2015) - and whatever intermediate step with minor fill-ups she had. So her 10k anniversary was just a few days ago. What a great opportunity for her to have a fill-up to 19k.

- "softened" - I think this needs actually clarification because it might have been put in wrong reference. Yes with each fill-up skin first thightens, after that relaxes and soften again. This is what she admitted in regards to her boobs after fill-ups. The softening happens because the skin tension induces skin growth and under good pre-condition even skin thickening - obviously this is the advantage Beshine has. Then the circle starts over again with the next fill-up. So when Beshine is talking about softening and relaxing this is the explanation for it and I don't know where the other explanation came from. Maybe from another board where another user said this before. The implants got so much more rounder and fuller, standing proud off her rib cage - the typical fake look, to the amount that there is now a ledge between her boobs and collarbone - supporting the fake boob look of the implant. I read several times she loves / is proud of the extreme "fake look". I know the fake look is not everyone's share - for me it does it very well.

- "check out her webcam" this is actually the best idea. http://www.camliveportal.com/cam/beshine is the URL. It is already visible in the free chat when she has the right top on - yesterday for example. She was wearing this top: http://www.beshine.com/tour/trailers/bus...ition.html that was close to bursting.
Even better is the GOLD show for 10 GOLD = 10 $ US for 7 mins. She extended the show duration from 5 - 7 min like 2-3 weeks ago. But much better is to watch her in private show or exclusive show and maybe activate your webcam and mic, too so you can do cam 2 cam with her.

Anyway forum users should build his / her own opinion.

And I think I have a great surprise to post. But maybe later today.

(02-20-2015, 09:26 PM)motorboatman Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-20-2015, 01:12 PM)nitschke66 Wrote: [ -> ][quote='andrat2000' pid='11208' dateline='1424451058']
Just stating she increases her stats IMMEDIATELY after a Chelsea increase.

[b]I noticed the same thing! This is actually the third time (that I know of) for sure that Beshine quickly adjusted her numbers after Chelsea. I remember one time it came within hours after Chelsea changed her own numbers. There's no doubt Beshine is obsessed with trying to keep up[/b]. Unfortunately she clearly reached her limit a while ago with the expanders because she hasn't shown a substantial increase in years and people are noticing on other forums so I put no faith in Beshine's new numbers. It's a simple advertising ploy, nothing more, again unfortunately. [b]The best hope for Beshine is to get new expanders to allow for more expansion otherwise she won't ever catch Chelsea, if that's her ultimate goal.
[/b]

I don't wish to blow my own trumpet or anything, but a while back I mentioned how these two woman are in something of a competition to have the title World's Largest Breasts.
I asked why it wasn't possible to have these two meet up and get measured so that we (and they) could find out who really is the biggest.
And I remember that some people thought that that could be a bit detrimental to them both, in that one was bound to be the loser and this could have a bad effect on the morale, social status, etc.

From what I've read now (above) I do feel that, if it's true, then it appears that there really[i] IS [/i]a bit of competition between the two of them.
I've got nothing against this in principal (they both enjoy the modelling, and we boob-hounds all love that, don't we?), but I do hope if this [i]is[/i] a competition I really hope that this doesn't eventually end up turning bad for both of them.
I like them [i]BOTH[/i], and I would hate to see this start to turn (unintentionally) aggressive or anything.

The long response offered above actually convinced me further that it didn't happen.

I've checked our her webcam for some time now. And that's exactly why I don't believe it.

Based on the webcam the size hasn't changed. Nothing has changed. Gravity is a wonderful thing and that's why they're lower. As gravity continues it's course, they will continue to get lower NOT bigger. (She's admitted that) There's no stopping it and NO other way of TRUTHFULLY explaining it.
[hr]
[quote='motorboatman' pid='11225' dateline='1424529934']
The long response offered above actually convinced me further that it didn't happen. I meant the response above Man of Kent, not Man of Kent's response.

I've checked our her webcam for some time now. And that's exactly why I don't believe it.

Based on the webcam the size hasn't changed. Nothing has changed of significance anyway. Gravity is a wonderful thing and that's why they're lower. As gravity continues it's course, they will continue to get lower NOT bigger. (She's admitted that) There's no stopping it and NO other way of TRUTHFULLY explaining it no matter how you spin it.

As far as competition goes, the only one I see is from Beshine's side. I'm a member of both sites and many things Chelsea does is copied hours or days later by Beshine. Whether it be phrasing, titles or even content additions.

With Chelsea's hectic performance schedule I doubt she has the time to concern herself with it. If anything, EVERYBODY is in competition WITH Chelsea because they're all chasing her. Meanwhile Chelsea has been on top so long now just slowly expanding, growing, growing and expanding. That patience is likely a factor in her sustained unmatched expansion.

Based on what I've seen recently from her, I wouldn't be surprised if Chelsea has already passed the 20 or 21K mark. I think that must be the comfort factor for her, knowing no matter what anybody else does with there limited expander implants, she can simply skip a drain and set another mark.

There has to be a movie idea for Chelsea here somewhere!

(02-21-2015, 07:01 AM)andrat2000 Wrote: [ -> ]And I think I have a great surprise to post. But maybe later today.

I just decided I'm not going to post this today. Let's wait a bit more.

You sir are evil

Agent "but in a good way" Dee

well I read on the other forum that some say she is 42 pounds in boobs plural. but in a older Chelsea video she said she was 30 each, and beshine is bigger than Chelsea when she did that video, here is a gif.



AD

(02-21-2015, 01:11 PM)Agent Dee Wrote: [ -> ]well I read on the other forum that some say she is 42 pounds in boobs plural. but in a older Chelsea video she said she was 30 each, and beshine is bigger than Chelsea when she did that video, here is a gif.

Being that the video shown is nearly a decade old, then Chelsea's boobs must be over 50 pounds each at this point. But it makes sense though knowing Chelsea was around 45 pounds each this past summer. That's crazy awesome. Mind blowing.

Right now I'm calculating ...

... so during May/June 2014 to February 2015 Beshine surpassed the 18k ml which is an approximated equivalent of how many pounds?

1 pound is 0,4536 kg
1 liter is a fraction heavier than 1 kg, but it is close to 1kg see here first line of table with temprature between 30°C and 40°C. A human body is at 37°C:
http://www.internetchemie.info/chemiewik...htetabelle

So 18k ml is 18 liters is 18 kgs is 39,68 pounds.

So let's say [B]18k is 40 pounds rounded.[/B]

Works for me

AD

(02-21-2015, 01:06 PM)Agent Dee Wrote: [ -> ]You sir are evil

Agent "but in a good way" Dee

You are going to need this:


That's why it takes a bit.

1 pound is 0,4536 kg
1 liter is a fraction heavier than 1 kg, but it is close to 1kg see here first line of table with temprature between 30°C and 40°C. A human body is at 37°C:
http://www.internetchemie.info/chemiewik...htetabelle

So if 2.2 pounds is 1K then . . .


Using that math it means Chelsea likely reached 22k and then just under 50 pounds or around 48.5 pounds. At first I thought this might be a little high and Chelsea might be closer to 20-21K, but you know she did take more breaks from the road the last half of 2014 than I remember previously, so it makes sense that this happened because she's admitted the only thing that ever slows her down with regards to expansion is the travel.

The 90's got nothing on us. Here's to more expansion for all women.

So giving Beshine recognition in the Beshine thread is always something nice, but now she even get recognition by the other big boob girls:

https://twitter.com/KaylaKleevage/status...9460659200

I have an idea. Why not rename this thread or merge it?

Btw. I just read a comment on another board of another Beshine webcam viewer who is known to be in shows very regularly since he comment Beshine camshow very often on her camsite. He says she got way way bigger in 2nd week of February when she was off from cam for 4 days.

A clean and simple explanation for the stats changes. I have to say a big excuse me to Beshine when I tried to explain it with complicated site issues/update procedures. I didn't wanted to troll or harass her with it. So I'm very sorry.

(02-21-2015, 01:47 PM)motorboatman Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-21-2015, 01:11 PM)Agent Dee Wrote: [ -> ]well I read on the other forum that some say she is 42 pounds in boobs plural. but in a older Chelsea video she said she was 30 each, and beshine is bigger than Chelsea when she did that video, here is a gif.

Being that the video shown is nearly a decade old, then Chelsea's boobs must be over 50 pounds each at this point. But it makes sense though knowing Chelsea was around 45 pounds each this past summer. That's crazy awesome. Mind blowing.

I'd thoroughly love knowing that this 45(lb) report is factual. How do you know this to be true ?
[hr]

(02-21-2015, 02:21 PM)andrat2000 Wrote: [ -> ]Right now I'm calculating ...

... so during May/June 2014 to February 2015 Beshine surpassed the 18k ml which is an approximated equivalent of how many pounds?

1 pound is 0,4536 kg
1 liter is a fraction heavier than 1 kg, but it is close to 1kg see here first line of table with temprature between 30°C and 40°C. A human body is at 37°C:
http://www.internetchemie.info/chemiewik...htetabelle

So 18k ml is 18 liters is 18 kgs is 39,68 pounds.

So let's say [B]18k is 40 pounds rounded.[/B]

Of course, all your statistics are based on info she releases. We really don't know that these are true & actual facts; thus, everything is conjectural.

Sure this calculation I did is based on Beshine released information. So yes, I work with her public released numbers because I can't lead publicity discussions with myself to agree on myself.

Except from Milena Velba like soon 10 years ago and I think it was Maxi Mounds, too, I can't recall a model weighing their boobs on a scale and this got reliable published. So we have to live with this ...

hey I am just glad we have great compeTITion between these legendary super boob babes, in the end, we ALL win!

AD

We have TWO dream girls with the biggest boobs in the world? I don't care what the stats are or what the masses think... I'm in HEAVEN!

that's what i am talking about the fact that we have them on this planet and Chelsea has somebody who can and or could out boob her that's so amazing.

AD

(02-21-2015, 01:06 PM)Agent Dee Wrote: [ -> ]You sir are evil

Agent "but in a good way" Dee

Sorry Agent Dee. The picture I wanted to load is too large. Only 500kb are allowed. And my file is a png with 1.4mb. Can't reduce it of the effect is gone. So can't do this here ... And I'm not using file hosters. So that's it. Sorry.

(02-23-2015, 01:29 PM)andrat2000 Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-21-2015, 01:06 PM)Agent Dee Wrote: [ -> ]You sir are evil

Agent "but in a good way" Dee

Sorry Agent Dee. The picture I wanted to load is too large. Only 500kb are allowed. And my file is a png with 1.4mb. Can't reduce it of the effect is gone. So can't do this here ... And I'm not using file hosters. So that's it. Sorry.

A JPEG would probably do the job. I often have to convert PNG files to JPEG to attach them here and I doubt anyone would ever know the difference.

(02-23-2015, 08:27 PM)Archaon Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-23-2015, 01:29 PM)andrat2000 Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-21-2015, 01:06 PM)Agent Dee Wrote: [ -> ]You sir are evil

Agent "but in a good way" Dee

Sorry Agent Dee. The picture I wanted to load is too large. Only 500kb are allowed. And my file is a png with 1.4mb. Can't reduce it of the effect is gone. So can't do this here ... And I'm not using file hosters. So that's it. Sorry.

A JPEG would probably do the job. I often have to convert PNG files to JPEG to attach them here and I doubt anyone would ever know the difference.

I already used a compressed PNG. it reduced the size from 2,6 to 1,4 mb.
Now it is a jpg.