(05-22-2014, 07:42 AM)Bonecracker Wrote: [ -> ]Afterwards, you may reach a more healthy approach to it, that of admiration of beautiful women and a fascination with the female form and the enormity of breasts!
I am already there. What makes you think of me so low?
(05-23-2014, 12:14 AM)man_in_space Wrote: [ -> ] (05-22-2014, 07:42 AM)Bonecracker Wrote: [ -> ]Afterwards, you may reach a more healthy approach to it, that of admiration of beautiful women and a fascination with the female form and the enormity of breasts!
I am already there. What makes you think of me so low?
Good Lord above, brother... I don't think anything but the best of you!! But you mentioned reaching the point of deleting all your images and I've been there too!
When I used the "you" it was purely in the general sense... a North American replacement of "one". So, when ONE reaches that point.... etc etc
We're all 'manos here.
Do we know chelsea's drain dates?
No idea... we usually find out after the fact and see updates/pics of "little Chelsea". We think of drain days as sad days... but she says she likes the way they feel 'squishy and soft' afterwards.
I think she must feel like superwoman, all light and agile
(05-21-2014, 03:47 PM)cabezotape Wrote: [ -> ]NEW video on chelsea site its incredible BIG!!!
Yes it really is! I'd love to post a screen-capture sample on it, but I'll have to check with the authorities first.
Just post a screen shot. Just will fall under fair use doctrine, and not violate her copyright. Also, just my opinion, but I'd rather ask for forgiveness than for permission.
(05-23-2014, 09:06 PM)JustSomeone Wrote: [ -> ]Just post a screen shot. Just will fall under fair use doctrine, and not violate her copyright. Also, just my opinion, but I'd rather ask for forgiveness than for permission.
End scene.
While doing some bookkeeping, I came across some 800 pics from Expos c1999 thru 2005 that I had forgotten about years ago. Surely some are duplicates but there still must be a large volume of good stuff that many or even most have never seen. The BIG question is: how much may we look at? What the hell, I'll risk posting a couple samples:
[
attachment=1612][
attachment=1613]
[hr]
And a couple more:
[
attachment=1614][
attachment=1615]
from her twitter:
I slept in this morning and the first thing I saw when I woke up? My GIGANTIC BOOBS
AD
Ah, one of my all-time favorite CC pics, posted by Titzling ©Score...
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=1615]](http://forum.bearchive.co/attachment.php?aid=1615)
that pic is one of my fave older ones and to think she was HUGE then and would only get MORE huge in the future *feels light headed*
AD
is the "funbag fitness" film downloadable somewhere? #daretoask
Official released sample of Chelsea's new set.
Dare I say, she looks smaller than the norm. Maybe it's just my tired eyes.
Its an old set from around 2005-2006
*edit: By old I was meaning that it was photographed a while ago but never released so it is new to the consumers.
every model releases new material years after it was taken. look at photoclubs, they still upload 'new' stuff of retired models.
Yes, it's a 2006 set. Pictures that weren't released before though.
[hr]
Here's something new Chelsea has for sale from her 'Closet'... a workout top!
Cant have the CC thread being so far down on the list ;P
[
attachment=1663]
She knows how to fill out a dress!
Nice save, Addy!! Is this a new pic, and do you know any deets about it?
I'd guess that it's new. I've never seen Chels in that dress anywhere before.
(06-08-2014, 10:07 AM)Kopykat Wrote: [ -> ]I'd guess that it's new. I've never seen Chels in that dress anywhere before.
I was thinking the exact same thing, KK!
Found it on a random tumblr, new to me to. I like it!