The Breast Enhancement Archive

(02-13-2013, 01:20 AM)Djoser Wrote: [ -> ]We appreciate your generosity titzling319, but i can't contain myself: is just me or she looks smaller than usual?

Nah, you're just missing the fish-eye lens that Pin Up uses.

Since 1999, I have been a constant follower (and observer) of everything Chelsea. Like all her fans, I've marveled at her consistant growth. When I got my first chance to see her live (last Dec. in Saginaw, MI) my first reaction was that I had never seen an image (non-Morph, that is) of this beautiful lady that captured how big her bust is in person. It is just immense. Each breast is the size of a basketball. I had read that some were turned off because her boobs were so hard...I don't know where they got their information because I found them (or maybe they found me) very soft and pliable and oh so heavy. How they can project so far horizontally is beyond understanding. Add a beautiful face, a pleasing personality and an overall sexy persona and it adds up to perhaps the most desireable woman on the planet. Just one man's opinion!

(02-13-2013, 05:55 PM)JustSomeone Wrote: [ -> ]Nah, you're just missing the fish-eye lens that Pin Up uses.

I know that breasts that size (ir any size) look bigger in person, but stilll...ehh don't pay attention at me, i am just skeptic, I love her and all but I think that beshine is bigger (and so chelsea's publicity team isn't telling us the truth about her size),

Also I don't like that most boob models lately are overusing fish eye lenses. It is cool from timne to time, but if they use it always i feel i am being deceived (lol and that goes to beshine too!)

That Ron Jeremy picture is interesting... Chelsea seems to enjoy the attention from him. Titzling, does Chelsea let her fans get that close?

What I know of Ron Jeremy's relationship with her is from Ron himself. He's like an uncle to her, he says, a naughty uncle though! LOL
[hr]
Some samples from her last set...


[hr]

(02-14-2013, 10:13 PM)JustSomeone Wrote: [ -> ]That Ron Jeremy picture is interesting... Chelsea seems to enjoy the attention from him. Titzling, does Chelsea let her fans get that close?

When she's on stage, anyone can get a ten second motorboat for a buck (I always gave her a five or a ten). A Polaroid is $10 or $20, depending on the club. I had a three song lapdance (between 12 and 15 minutes) that cost $150 and was worth every dime. One of her $750/hr Private Dances would probably kill an old man like me!

I am very happy for your good fortune there, titzling, but equally jealous! LOL

Djoser: Short of standing them up side-by-side and applying a measuring tape (wouldn't that be a sight, figure we could sell tickets?) we will probably never know the real sizes of Chelsea and Beshine. When I saw Chelsea, Dec.6, 2012, she was billed as 153XXX. 153cm = 60.24" and that seemed about right. I used my tape measure on Maxi Mounds in 2000 and she was about 62". When I saw Chelsea again, Feb. 1, 2013, she was billed as 181XXX or 71.26". She did look bigger but not 11" bigger. The next week I saw her again and asked if she had actually been measured to come up with the new stat. She just laughed and said, "They're just numbers." Beshine has recently boasted a 177XXX bust (or 69.24"). Was Chelsea's size bumped up so she would be just ahead of Beshine? As Johnny Mathis once sang, "It's Not for Me to Say."
Here are a few samples from an early PhotoClubs shoot that was posted back in October of 2000. Enjoy!
[hr]
[attachment=354][attachment=353]
[hr]
[attachment=355][attachment=356]
[hr]
[attachment=357][attachment=358]
[hr]
[attachment=359][attachment=360]
[hr]
[attachment=361][attachment=362]

aw, she was so TEENY TINY back then , who knew she would blow up almost more than double the size she was in those early pics from 2000 *shocked*.

AD

yes those are classics, as D says: she is bigger than the morphs of those classic pictures!

Some screen shots of her latest video


[hr]


[hr]
I love that third one. She's like a human letter P

wish there was more footage in that vid of her walking around at that angle

I love how underneath her every her every twitter tweat has an "expand" option under it!! I always click on it. LOL
[hr]
Samples of her new newsletter are now in the gallery too!!

(02-18-2013, 05:45 PM)Bonecracker Wrote: [ -> ]I love how underneath her every her every twitter tweat has an "expand" option under it!! I always click on it. LOL

Samples of her new newsletter are now in the gallery too!!

She said that she was up to 72 inches in this newsletter too!

[i][color=gray]don't mind me, just fixing up some html/bbcode here... - your friendly neighborhood Bonecracker![/color][/i]

I've added set samples from some very old "Classic" Chelsea sets in the Gallery.[attachment=420]"Glasses" from 2000
[hr]
[attachment=422]"Cowgirl Dressing Room" from 2002[attachment=421]"Pool" from 2003.

Thanks, Titzling. I was very fond of her "torpedo tits" period also.

(02-18-2013, 11:25 PM)dairymanbig Wrote: [ -> ]She said that she was up to 72 inches in this newsletter too!

6 ft!! that's a ft more bustline than her height!

(02-20-2013, 03:06 PM)Djoser Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-18-2013, 11:25 PM)dairymanbig Wrote: [ -> ]She said that she was up to 72 inches in this newsletter too!

6 ft!! that's a ft more bustline than her height!

no, she would have to be 74 inches to be a foot bigger around than she is tall at 72" she is only 10 inches bigger around than she is tall still an epic size but to have a bust measurement of a foot bigger around than she is tall is damn awesome in my book (when she gets there and she WILL get there!).

AD

She was already 72 inches, the context was that she reached it again in September. She tweeted about it around that time as well.

I'd say she's on track for 16500k this year!

I'd say you're right, tea. She keeps threatening to go as high as 20,000. One threat I would like to see her follow through on.

I have seen the future, and it is good



AD

Gotta say she looks FANTASTIC here, love the look, the size, her expression, hell even her hair!




AD

The really interesting thing about this set is the shirt. Take a look at the seam, it was tailored for her breasts

[attachment=423]

[attachment=433]I've added a few sets and samples to the Chelsea Gallery starting with the Floral Halter pics from 2007.
[hr]
[attachment=434]The Cornfield set is from 2000. I hope it's OK that I posted every image that I could find.
[hr]
[attachment=435]The Black Blouse samples are from 2010.
[hr]
[attachment=436]The Black Tube Top pics are from a 2012 Expo.

that black tube top is epic I can almost hear it protest from the strain of those awesome monsters!

AD