^that made my brain hurt lol
AD
[i]Edited by Bone as per special request[/i]
[s]Anyway I now want to enjoy CC's beauty and growth spurts.[/s] Why not delete the rest of the discussion, too?
[i]Edited by Bone as per special request[/i]
And, according to everyone who has met her in person... Photos don't do her justice! Everyone says she looks WAY bigger in person!
Right on! Hard to explain but, in person, her waist is smaller and her tits are bigger, way bigger...and soft...and heavy...and fragrant...and beautiful...and just plain wonderful!
Damn, I get hard just thinking about her!
but when you stuck a camera right in front of the boobs and face is not anywhere near the camera then it looks like a fisheye somewhat....dont you understand this? of course the boobs will look unnatural huge somewhat if you put the camera even normal lense to a certain point. just try it yourself on yourself. try to take a "bignose" pic of yourself...of course you can do it...put it just a little under your nose but very close to it...in the pic your nose is gonna look really big., unnatural big...yeah yeah. no fisheye then but taken in a way that biggers the boobs
Except this is Chelsea and the face is nowhere NEAR the boobs under any circumstances!
LMAO
sorry, I could not resist
AD
[i]Edited by Bone... Pio, you're borderline insulting here.[/i]
Here's an OFFICIAL screenshot sample from her latest video!
Her boobs don't look so big but she's beautiful like always
(08-08-2014, 01:43 PM)pio Wrote: [ -> ]Her boobs don't look so big but she's beautiful like always
You should see the entire video before you pass judgment! There are quite a variety of segments to it, including a workout segment that is rather spectacular.
And how do you see this video?
[size=4][b]Join her site!
[/size][/b]
i am a HUGE FAN OF THIS PHOTo setif anyone could throw me a few samples of it that would be a clutch play as i must have missed it
(08-06-2014, 12:11 PM)Bonecracker Wrote: [ -> ]Just so we DO NOT get into this debate again...
[size=3][color=darkred][b][i]"She uses a simple garden variety camera with no SPECIAL fish eye or SPECIAL wide angle lenses whatsoever. She has gone through dozens of growth spurts over her career due to her string implants which allow her to get bigger/grow whenever she so desires. Her unique implants literally let her add cc's every moment of every day. As they GROW they will obviously look increasingly bigger. Enjoy the continued expansion."[/size][/color][/b][/i]
Great information from cubeman. Thanks!
(08-08-2014, 12:36 PM)Bonecracker Wrote: [ -> ]Here's an OFFICIAL screenshot sample from her latest video!
It's amazing how much Chelsea updates her site. Seems like every few days. Although I'd like to see some HD video eventually.
She really has turned around and listened to the fans and made a big change in the attention to her website.
We really appreciate it too!
Special thanks to Cubeman who is ALWAYS working hard on her website and continuously considers the fans!!
(08-10-2014, 06:27 PM)motorboatman Wrote: [ -> ]It's amazing how much Chelsea updates her site. Seems like every few days. Although I'd like to see some HD video eventually.
I already thanked Cubeman - what a nice man! I'm currently enjoying the new pictures and movie.
So you want HD (720p) eventually?
(08-11-2014, 01:05 AM)andrat2000 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-10-2014, 06:27 PM)motorboatman Wrote: [ -> ]It's amazing how much Chelsea updates her site. Seems like every few days. Although I'd like to see some HD video eventually.
I already thanked Cubeman - what a nice man! I'm currently enjoying the new pictures and movie.
So you want HD (720p) eventually?
Any HD at this point will suffice. Anything really, would be a step up I think.
I'm not as convinced. I really dislike HD. I like the pictures and videos, like film, to have a softer than real life quality to them. This ultra high definition crap has got me rattled. You can see every pore in a person's skin. The 'flaws' are almost exaggerated and I don't like that at all.
(08-11-2014, 10:14 AM)lolchair Wrote: [ -> ]Well to be honest i am no fan of ultra hd either. I think that full hd/1080p is enough for now since it matches most modern monitors. All those extra pixels dont have much vaue unless you feel the need to zoom in.
What i dont understand is why Chelsea releases pictures below 720p. Even the cellphone I had in 2005 (2megapixel) was able to take higher resolution pics then that. From a tech perspective there is absolutely no reason to stay at such a low resolution....
LOL wait help me out here. I thought her photo sets lately were higher res?
Well, higher quality than 62kb pictures might be a good idea!
The Official Sample from Chelsea's new newsletter bonus pics!
Why not
Join Now ? For only $14.95 a month, and the tremendous number of updates lately, it's well worth the money.
I would join, but i donĀ“t like CCBill
.
Me neither. I understand completely. I'll ask the admin about that!